The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel: Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers.Prescott, Thomas H.
History
The American Encyclopedia of History, Biography and Travel: Comprising Ancient and Modern History: the Biography of Eminent Men of Europe and America, and the Lives of Distinguished Travelers.
Prescott, Thomas H.
Biography; World history
In the same year commenced the parliamentary proceedings against Mr.
Warren Hastings, for alleged cruelty and robbery exercised upon the
natives of India during his governorship of that dependency of Great
Britain. These proceedings were urged by Mr. Burke and other members
of the Whig party, and excited so much public indignation against Mr.
Hastings, that the ministry were obliged, though unwillingly, to lend
their countenance to his trial, which took place before Parliament in
the most solemn manner, and occupied in the aggregate one hundred and
forty-nine days, extending over the space of several years. The
proceedings resulted in the acquittal of Mr. Hastings.
The king and queen had in the meantime become the parents of a
numerous family of sons and daughters. The eldest son, George, Prince
of Wales, had now for several years been of age, and exempted from the
control of his father. He had no sooner been set up in an
establishment of his own, than he plunged into a career of
prodigality, forming the most striking contrast with the chastened
simplicity and decorum of the paternal abode. He also attached himself
to the party of the Opposition, though rather apparently from a
principle of contradiction to his father, than a sincere approbation
of their political objects. The result was the complete alienation of
the Prince of Wales from the affections of his majesty.
In November 1788, an aberration of intellect, resulting from an
illness of some duration, was observed in the king, and it became
necessary to provide some species of substitute for the exercise of
the royal functions. To have invested the Prince of Wales with the
regency, appeared the most obvious course; but this would have thrown
out the ministry, as it was to be supposed that his royal highness
would call the chiefs of his own party to his councils. Mr. Fox
contended that the hereditary nature of the monarchy pointed out an
unconditional right in the prince to assume the supreme power under
such circumstances; but Mr. Pitt asserted the right of Parliament to
give or withhold such an office, and proposed to assign certain limits
to the authority of the intended regent, which would have placed the
existing ministry beyond his reach. The Irish Parliament voted the
unconditional regency to the prince; but that of Great Britain was
about to adopt the modified plan proposed by Mr. Pitt, when, March
1789, the king suddenly recovered, and put an end to the difficulty.
The debates on the regency question exhibit in a very striking light
how statesmen will sometimes abandon their most favorite dogmas and
strongest principles on the call of their own immediate interests.
FRENCH REVOLUTION, AND CONSEQUENT WAR WITH FRANCE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account