The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern ConfederacyAbel, Annie Heloise
History
The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy
Abel, Annie Heloise
Indian Territory; Slavery -- United States; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
[14] Under the Intercourse Law of 1834, the Indian Territory had been
annexed for judicial purposes to the western district of Arkansas. The
Indians were much dissatisfied. They felt themselves entitled to a federal
court of their own, a privilege the United States government persistently
denied to them but one that the Confederate government readily granted. As
matters stood, prior to the Civil War, the red men seemed always at the
mercy of the white man's distorted conception of justice and were,
perforce, quite beyond the reach of the boasted guaranties of theoretical
Anglo-Saxon justice since the very location of the court precluded a trial
by their peers of the vicinage. The journey to Arkansas, in those early
days, was long and tiresome and expensive. Complications frequently arose
and matters, difficult of adjustment, even under the best of circumstance.
Among the Creeks and Seminoles, the status of the free negro was
exceptionally high, partly due, with respect to the latter, to conditions
growing out of the Second Seminole War. As already intimated, the Creeks
had no aversion whatsoever to race mixtures and intermarriage between
negroes and Indians was rather common. The half-breeds resulting from such
unions were accepted as bona fide members of the tribe by the Indians in
the distribution of annuities, but not by the United States
courts--another source of difficulty and a very instructive one as well,
particularly from the standpoint of reconstructionist exactions.
Occasionally the presence of the free negro within the Indian country was
a source of grave danger. The accompanying letters outline a case in
point:
HEAD QUARTERS 7TH. MIL: DEPT. FORT SMITH, March 5th. 1852.
SIR: By direction of the Colonel commanding the Department I transmit
herewith copies of a communication from George Folsom, Chief of the
Pushmataha District, to Colonel Wilson Choctaw Agent and one from
Colonel William Wilson Choctaw Agent to Brevet Major Holmes commanding
Fort Washita asking aid from the Military force.
As the letter from the Choctaw Agent is not sufficiently explicit as
to what he wishes done by the Military authority the subject is
referred to you, and if on investigation it be found that Military
interference is necessary to enforce the intercourse law, prompt
assistance will be rendered for the purposes therein specified, under
the direction and in presence of the Choctaw Agent. Respectfully Yr
Obt. Servt.,
FRANCIS N PAGE, Asst. Adjt. Genl.
Colonel John Drennen, Superintendent W. T.
_Inclosure_
CHOCTAW AGENCY, February 9th 1852
SIR: The enclosed copy of a letter from Colonel George Folsom Chief of
Pushmataha District of the Choctaw Nation will put you in possession
of the facts and reasons why I address you at this time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account