The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern ConfederacyAbel, Annie Heloise
History
The American Indian as Slaveholder and Seccessionist: An Omitted Chapter in the Diplomatic History of the Southern Confederacy
Abel, Annie Heloise
Indian Territory; Slavery -- United States; United States -- History -- Civil War, 1861-1865
Your demand that those people of the nation who are in favor of
joining the Confederacy be allowed to organize into military companies
as Home Guards, for the purpose of defending themselves in case of
invasion from the North, is most respectfully declined. I cannot give
my consent to any such organization for very obvious reasons: First,
it would be a palpable violation of my position as a neutral; second,
it would place in our midst organized companies not authorized by our
laws but in violation of treaty, and who would soon become efficient
instruments in stirring up domestic strife and creating internal
difficulties among the Cherokee people. As in this connection you have
misapprehended a remark made in conversation at our interview some
eight or ten days ago, I hope you will allow me to repeat what I did
say. I informed you that I had taken a neutral position, and would
maintain it honestly, but that in case of a foreign invasion, old as I
am, I would assist in repelling it....
It will develop later how Ross's wishes with respect to the enrollment of
Home Guards were successfully and adroitly circumvented, with the
connivance of General McCulloch, by men of the Ridge faction in Cherokee
politics. From the beginning, McCulloch seemed determined not to take Ross
seriously, yet he duly informed Secretary Walker of the turn events were
taking. On the twelfth of June, for instance, he wrote[243] to him and
gave an account of his recent interview with the Cherokee chief. It was
rather a misleading account, however; for it conveyed to Walker the idea
that Ross was only waiting for provocation from the North to throw in his
lot with the Confederacy. On the twenty-second of June, McCulloch
wrote[244] to Walker again and to the same effect as far as his belief
that Ross was not sincere in his professions of neutrality was concerned,
even though, in the interval between the two letters, he had been
carefully corrected by Ross himself and even though he was, at the very
time, sending on to Richmond, the correspondence that denied the truth of
his own statement. He did, however, add that his belief now was that Ross
was awaiting a favorable moment to join forces with the North.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account