─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼───────────────── ARIZONA │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 1 Ft. │Yes. │Holding their │Yes, much better. Defiance │ │allotments. │ │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 2 Parker │Yes. │Keeping their │Decidedly so. │ │allotments. │ │ │ │ No. 3 Phoenix │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 4 Sacaton │Do not know. │No allotments │Need water to │ │made. │improve. │ │ │ No. 5 St. │Yes. │Holding │Yes. Michaels │ │allotments. │ │ │ │ No. 6 Tucson │Cannot answer. │Holding their │Cannot answer. │ │allotments. │ │ │ │ No. 7 │Yes. │Allotments held │It is. │ │by the │ │ │Government. │ │ │ │ ─────────────────┼─────────────────┼─────────────────┼───────────────── CALIFORNIA │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 1 Banning │There has not. │No allotments. │Decidedly better. │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 2 Campo │No children sent │No allotments. │Fifty per cent │home. │ │better. │ │ │ │ │ │ No. 3 Covelo │Only healthy │No allotment held│More farming, │children │by white men. │morals very │enrolled. │ │little improved. │ │ │ No. 4 El Cujon │No. │No allotments. │Yes. │ │ │ No. 5 Greenville │Yes. │Few allotments │Yes. │ │sold to best │ │ │interest of │ │ │Indian. │ │ │ │ No. 6 Likely │No. │Holding them. │No, much worse. │ │ │ No.