Ke gee unnoenig, He (sent) you. Ainnoezhid, He (sent) me. Ainnoenaud, He (sent) him, &c. Iau e-mau, He is there. Ke geedo, He (spoke.) Kegeeweendumaug, He (told) you. Ke to dum, He did it. We reply, to this answer of the native speaker, that the particle _kau_ prefixed to a verb denotes the past tense,--that in the former series of terms, in which this particle appears, the verbs are in the perfect indicative,--and in the latter, they are in the present indicative, marking the difference only between _sent_ and _send_, _spoke_ and _speak_, &c. And that there is absolutely no relative pronoun, in either series of terms. We further observe, that the personal pronoun ween, prefixed to the first set of terms, may be prefixed with equal propriety, to the second set, and that its use or disuse, is perfectly optional with the speaker, as he may wish to give additional energy or emphasis to the expression. To these positions, after reflection, discussion and examination, we receive an assent, and thus the uncertainty is terminated. We now wish to apply the principle thus elicited to verbs causative, and other compound terms--to the adjective verbs, for instance--and to the other verbal compound expressions, in which the objective and the nominative persons, are incorporated as a part of the verb, and are not prefixes to it. This may be shown in the causative verb, _To make Happy_. Mainwaindumeid, He (who) makes _me_ happy. Mainwaindumeik, He (who) makes _thee_ happy. Mainwaindumeaud, He (who) makes _him_ happy. Mainwaindumeinung, He (who) makes _us_ happy. (inclusive.) Mainwaindumeyaug, He (who) makes _us_ happy. (exclusive.) Mainwaindumeinnaig, He (who) makes _ye_ or _you_ happy. Mainwaindumeigowaud, He (who) makes _them_ happy. And so the forms might be continued, throughout all the objective persons.-- Mainwaindumeyun, Thou (who) makest me happy, &c.