The American Language: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Development of English in the United StatesMencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
General
The American Language: A Preliminary Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States
Mencken, H. L. (Henry Louis)
Americanisms; English language; Names -- United States; Names, Personal -- United States
I was willing to tell her all about /them/ two poor girls.... They
must not be /no/ mistake about who is the boss in my house. Some men
/lets/ their /wife/ run all over them.... Allen has /went/ to a
college football game. One of the reporters /give/ him a pass.... He
called up and said he /hadn't/ only the one pass, but he was not
hurting my feelings /none/.... The flat across the hall from this
/here/ one is for rent.... If we should /of boughten/ furniture it
would cost us in the neighborhood of $100, even without /no/
piano.... I consider myself lucky to /of/ found out about this before
it was too late and somebody else had /of/ gotten the tip.... It will
always be /ourn/, even when we move away.... Maybe you could /of did/
better if you had /of went/ at it in a different way.... Both /her/
and you /is/ welcome at my house.... I never /seen/ so much wine
/drank/ in my life....
[Pg192]
Here are specimens to fit into most of Charters' categories--verbs
confused as to tense, pronouns confused as to case, double and even
triple negatives, nouns and verbs disagreeing in number, /have/
softened to /of/, /n/ marking the possessive instead of /s/, /like/
used in place of /as/, and the personal pronoun substituted for the
demonstrative adjective. A study of the whole story would probably
unearth all the remaining errors noted in Kansas City. Lardner's
baseball player, though he has pen in hand and is on his guard, and is
thus very careful to write /would not/ instead of /wouldn't/ and even
/am not/ instead of /ain't/, offers a comprehensive and highly
instructive panorama of popular speech habits. To him the forms of the
subjunctive mood have no existence, and /will/ and /shall/ are
identical, and adjectives and adverbs are indistinguishable, and the
objective case is merely a variorum form of the nominative. His past
tense is, more often than not, the orthodox present tense. All fine
distinctions are obliterated in his speech. He uses invariably the
word that is simplest, the grammatical form that is handiest. And so
he moves toward the philological millennium dreamed of by George T.
Lanigan, when "the singular verb shall lie down with the plural noun,
and a little conjugation shall lead them."
§ 3
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account