The American Nations, Vol. I.: Or, Outlines of a National History of the Ancient and Modern Nations of North and South AmericaRafinesque, C. S. (Constantine Samuel)
History
The American Nations, Vol. I.: Or, Outlines of a National History of the Ancient and Modern Nations of North and South America
Rafinesque, C. S. (Constantine Samuel)
Indians; Indians -- Origin; Taino Indians; Taino language
15 The precious commodities of America are numberless. If the Europeans
had traded there for them, as they now do in China, Persia, Arabia
and Africa, how different would have been the fate of America? Iron
would have purchased gold and pearls, with every thing else: there
was no need to use the steel swords, nor thundering guns. Coffee and
rice are not American productions, but lately introduced from Arabia
and India. The origin of the sugar cane is also oriental; but it was
found wild in South America, as orange trees were in Florida.
16 The physical changes undergone in America within late historical
recollections are very numerous, and ought to be collected into one
connected body by historians or geologists.
17 These two figures of speech, _Personification_ and _Animalization_,
are two of the keys of ancient history. By the first is not meant
alone the personification of the passions or divine attributes; but
likewise the individuality of men, tribes and nations pervading
primitive history, by the frequent substitution of the singular for
the plural, as was done by the Asiatics, the Greeks, and the
Americans. It is thus that the ancient patriarchs, Hercules, Heros,
Gods &c. are often meant for their followers; the head for the whole
set or social body. This practice has survived to our days, and we
mean all the English when we speak of _John Bull_, the Russians by
the _Northern Bear_ (a kind of animalization), all the Turks by _the
Grand Turk_ &c. The reverse mode of speech or the employment of the
plural for the singular, is less frequent: but used when we
substitute in our modern languages, _We_ and _You_ instead of I or
Thee. It was less common anciently, yet it appears Moses employed it
when he called God, ALEIM our _Elohim_ or _the Angels_, and
polytheism was the consequence of similar mistakes or substitutions;
but in his account of the patriarchs, he has used the individuality
of tribes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account