The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological studyMichaud, Régis
History
The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological study
Michaud, Régis
American fiction -- History and criticism; Psychological fiction, American -- History and criticism; Social problems in literature
In spite of all the so-called laws and prophets, there is
apparently in Nature no such thing as the right to do or the right
not to do, if you reach the place where the significance of the
social chain in which you find yourself is not satisfactory. The
murderer has under the written law no right to murder anybody. It
is perfectly plain that he has the right if he is willing to pay
the penalty, or if he can evade it. Conscience, this thing called
conscience, to which people repeatedly appeal, is, as I have
pointed out elsewhere, little more than a built-up net of social
acceptances and agreements in regard to society or the agreed
state of facts in which we all find ourselves when we arrive here;
in other words, all the things which we wish to do and be, or
avoid.[19]
In this unromantic universe Dreiser moves with admiration and delight.
At the bottom of his philosophy there is a calm and serene--but
disenchanted--individualism, very much like that which took Nietzsche
beyond evil and good. Dreiser accepts the struggle for survival like a
convinced Darwinian. He views life as a chaos of blind and amorphous
energies roused by mysterious and ominous ferments. The game of life
is that of the great individuals against the masses. Great men tending
to self-expression and self-expansion find themselves blocked by the
overwhelming numbers of elementary and gregarious humanity. Hence the
war between society and the élite of supermen. Dreiser’s evolutionism,
however, does not in the least imply an idea of progress. Change there
is, eternal change, mutation, compensation, and, in the last analysis
eternal return.
Thus Dreiser’s evolutionism is purely organic and static. It is
strictly realistic. The fact that a few great individuals emerge
from the mass does not justify higher expectations for the future
of mankind. Besides, they do not always emerge. Many dynosaurs and
superhuman giants fail pitifully and are buried alive in the mud.
Geology and anthropology endorse Dreiser’s pessimism on the subject of
man’s fight with the blind forces of nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account