The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological studyMichaud, Régis
History
The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological study
Michaud, Régis
American fiction -- History and criticism; Psychological fiction, American -- History and criticism; Social problems in literature
Those of us endowed with these things in mind and blood are truly
terrible to the mass--pariahs, failures, shams, disgraces. Yet life
is no better than its worst elements, no worse than its best. Its
perfections are changing temporalities, illusions of perfection
that will be something very different to-morrow.
Again I say, we do not know what life is--not nearly enough to
set forth a fixed code of any kind, religious or otherwise. But
we do know that it sings and stings, that it has perfections,
entrancements, shames--each according to his blood flux and its
chemical character. Life is rich, gorgeous, an opium-eater’s dream
of something paradisiacal--but it is never the thin thing that thin
blood and a weak, ill-nourished, poorly responding brain would make
it, and that is where the majority of our religions, morals, rules
and safeguards come from. From thin, petered-out blood, and poor,
nervous, non-commanding, weak brains.
Life is greater than anything we know.
It is stronger.
It is wilder.
It is more horrible.
It is more beautiful.
We need not stop and think we have found a solution. We have
not even found a beginning. We do not know. And my patriotic
father wanted us all to believe in the Catholic Church and the
Infallibility of the Pope and confession and communion!
Great Pan of the Greeks, and you, Isis of the Egyptians, save me!
These moderns are all insane![26]
Thus speaks the American Zarathustra.
Theodore Dreiser was not satisfied with lyrical statements of his
philosophy. “Hey Rub-a-Dub-Dub” is a direct and almost _ex professo_
comment on the subject of life and conduct. Important qualifications
of his pessimism will be found in particular in an important essay
of that book, called “The Inevitable Equation.” Yes, Dreiser is a
moralist; may I say an Emersonian moralist? “The Inevitable Equation”
recalls to our mind Emerson’s famous essay on “Compensation.” Crimes,
monstrosities, lust and greed, the rascalities of Frank Cowperwood or
the crimes of Clyde Griffiths do not disturb the novelist’s serenity.
He does not feel the need, like Zola, of calling society to the rescue,
or like Dostoievski to resort to mysticism to make the world better. He
remains a positivist. Life is Life. _C’est la guerre!_ Call it God, the
Oversoul or the Vital Force, the ruling energies of Nature are blind
and indifferent. Never did Nature listen to a course in philosophy.
What does Dreiser care how the Vital Force will call itself? It is
enough for him that he can wonder daily at its wonderful display.
A volcano or a cyclone are not moral, but they are impressive and
thrilling. A world without dangers would not be an interesting world.
Moreover there is an automatic (or call it, if you like, providential)
Westinghouse brake somewhere in the worst furies of the monster. Nature
is a self-regulated energy. It manages alone to keep a balance in the
midst of its turmoil.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account