The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological studyMichaud, Régis
History
The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological study
Michaud, Régis
American fiction -- History and criticism; Psychological fiction, American -- History and criticism; Social problems in literature
3. The law of our instincts is diametrically opposed to the social
code.
4. It is through his instincts that man is most completely and most
dangerously what he really is.
5. Once given a temperament it can never be changed. There is no
moral progress, no conversion possible from evil to good.
6. Biology controls our body and contradicts social ethics.
7. Consequently our social organization, ethics, politics (and
why not the whole of our civilization?) are biologically and
chemically false.
8. All principles and institutions which ignore bio-chemical man
and which are not deeply rooted in instincts and physiological
necessities are false.
_Also spake Zarathustra!_ Auguste Comte, before Dreiser, had given
biology as a required foundation of social ethics but he finally
felt the necessity to build a moral and religious roof upon the
house. All the hounds of materialism and romanticism unleashed can
be heard howling in the decalogue of Dreiser. Rousseau before him,
with Helvetius and _tutti quanti_ among the eighteenth-century
encyclopedists, had raised before him the law of nature against the law
of the mind. The result, as Thomas Carlyle proved, was the guillotine
and Armageddon. Are we going to deny all the efforts of the saints,
the ascetics, the heroes, the philosophers, the artists, to undo the
patient and painful and slow uprising of mankind out of the primitive
slime, to save Clyde Griffiths from the electric chair and restore the
Dinoceras? Society may be wrong in forcing golf upon mankind for a
substitute to the _vie dangereuse_ or in finding a reservation for the
Apaches in prison, but who will seriously complain? Let us bless the
good Providence who gave us a chance to learn football and baseball as
a catharsis to soothe and purge our temperament. To follow Dreiser’s
ethics would be very much like courting cosmic suicide, and let us
wish that the rattlesnake and the shark will last not as a rule but as
exceptions among us, so that we ourselves may also have a chance to
express our temperament and a chance to survive. All of us can safely
enjoy the sight of wild beasts at the zoo or in the “movies.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account