The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological studyMichaud, Régis
History
The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological study
Michaud, Régis
American fiction -- History and criticism; Psychological fiction, American -- History and criticism; Social problems in literature
The case of Carol Kennicott recalls to mind that of Emma Bovary in
Flaubert’s novel, but there is a difference due to the fact that Carol
was born in America. Carol’s life is much less gloomy than Emma’s.
Doctor Kennicott is a better and more interesting man than Emma’s
husband. Gopher Prairie, in spite of all its shortcomings, is a more
cheerful place to live in than Mme. Bovary’s Normandy village. Who
knows whether Emma, had she migrated to the United States, would not
have ended by getting reconciled to a world where the thrills of the
movies, the automobile and the radio would have cured her of her
blues? As a member of a women’s club, and a social worker, she might
have taken a new interest in existence. Carol and Emma were, in many
respects, twin sisters. Both liked to read fiction and to mistake what
they read for reality. Both were married to commonplace and unromantic
country doctors. Both liked to build castles in Spain. Both shocked the
world around them by their adventures and escapades. As an artist, it
is true, Lewis does not come up to Flaubert’s level. Flaubert’s style
is plastic, something for the eye, as well as for the ear, to enjoy.
Lewis is almost exclusively oral, but he excels Flaubert in making
things and people move, breathe and speak in a lifelike way.
There is, according to the novelist, a double legend concerning the
American small town. The first is sentimental. According to it:
The American village remains the sure abode of friendship, honesty,
and clean, sweet, marriageable girls. Therefore all men who succeed
in painting in Paris or in finance in New York at last become weary
of smart women, return to their native town, assert that cities
are vicious, marry their childhood sweethearts and, presumably,
joyously abide in those towns until death.[31]
Then there is the “roughing it” legend:
The other tradition is that the significant features of all
villages are whiskers, iron dogs upon lawns, gold bricks, checkers,
jars of gilded cat-tails, and shrewd comic old men who are known as
“hicks” and who ejaculate “Waal, I swan.” This altogether admirable
tradition rules the vaudeville stage, factious illustrators, and
syndicate newspaper humor, but out of actual life it passed forty
years ago. Carol’s small town thinks not in horse-swapping but in
cheap motor cars, telephones, ready-made clothes, silos, alfalfa,
kodaks, phonographs, leather-upholstered Morris chairs, bridge
prizes, oil-stocks, motion-pictures, land-deals, unread sets of
Mark Twain, and a chaste version of national politics.[32]
In such a town, we are told, for every two contented people there are
hundreds, especially among the young, who are not. That is why the
intelligent and the well-to-do travel and leave for the big cities from
which they hope never to return. Even in the West the elder people
emigrate. They go to California to die.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account