The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological studyMichaud, Régis
History
The American novel to-day : $b A social and psychological study
Michaud, Régis
American fiction -- History and criticism; Psychological fiction, American -- History and criticism; Social problems in literature
The satire of publicity in “Babbitt” was timely. Lewis denounced its
brutal and tragic aspects. He showed it as a dangerous charlatanism,
an invasion of private life, a violation of free choice, an insult to
common sense. Unbridled publicity, as it is sometimes practised in the
United States, presupposes in its victims brains which have been dulled
to the point of apathy. One cannot very well imagine the American
methods of advertising as exposed in “Babbitt” succeeding in a nation
as traditionally ironical and free-minded as France, for instance,
where the average man is imbued with the Cartesian spirit and refuses
to accept as true anything which does not appear evident--even if it
were offered to him in a gold spoon.
Yet the American surrenders to publicity without much ado, with
resignation rather than with enthusiasm. I do not believe that he
is blind to the tricks of the advertisers. But he is busy and he
uses publicity as a convenience. The commercial “ad” is a machine
to simplify existence. “Time is money.” It spares one the bother of
choosing. It leads directly towards a goal. It facilitates shopping
which Americans, especially women, cultivate as one of their favorite
outdoor sports.
Babbitt is publicity personified, and the most curious characters in
the book are inveterate publicity maniacs.
* * * * *
“Arrowsmith” is a bitter and an almost tragic book. It takes up again
the case of advertising and its evil influence in the higher spheres.
In this novel we find the same verve, the same satirical genius,
the same humor of the preceding books. Yet the humor is darker and
decidedly more pessimistic. There is no happy ending and no compromise
in “Arrowsmith.” The equivocal attitude of the author towards his
characters has disappeared. Antagonisms are well defined and Lewis
does not straddle both issues at the same time. On one side stand the
charlatans, on the other the true and disinterested scientists. The
contrast between them is sharply and tragically emphasized. To make it
more so, the author brought reinforcements to the central characters.
Arrowsmith is not alone--like Carol or Babbitt. He has an escort of
devoted friends. Science is represented and defended by two or three
representative men, the Nietzschean Gottlieb, the heroic Sondelius and
the mystical Wicket. In the enemy’s camp there is Doctor Pickerbaugh
and this is enough. He is unique as a mountebank.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account