The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
History
The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912
Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
Philippines -- History -- 1898-1946; Philippines -- Politics and government -- 1898-1935
On the eighth day after General Miller had asked permission of the
Iloilo village Hampdens to enforce the orders of the President of
the United States, the "Federal Government of the Visayas," through
its President, Senor Lopez, finally deigned to notice Mr. McKinley's
proclamation. It said under date of January 9th:
General: We have the high honor of having received your message,
dated January 1st, of this year, enclosing letter of President
McKinley. You say in one clause of your message: "As indicated in
the President's cablegram, under these conditions the inhabitants
of the island of Panay ought to obey the political authority of the
United States, and they will incur a grave responsibility if, after
deliberating, they decide to resist said authority." So the council
of state of this region of Visayas are, at this present moment,
between the authority of the United States, that you try to impose
on us, and the authority of the central government of Malolos.
Then follows this remarkable statement of the case for the Filipinos:
The supposed authority of the United States began with the
Treaty of Paris, on the 10th of December, 1898. The authority of
the Central Government of Malolos is founded in the sacred and
natural bonds of blood, language, uses, customs, ideas, (and)
sacrifices. [169]
General Otis was fond of throwing cold water on any particularly
eloquent Filipino insurrecto document he had occasion to put in
his reports by saying that Mabini was "the brains of" the Malolos
Government--meaning the only brains it had [170]--and that he probably
wrote such document, whatever it might be. But here is a piece of
real eloquence, originating away down in the Visayan Islands, as
far away from Malolos as Colonel Stark and his "Green Mountain Boys"
were from Washington and Hamilton in 1776 and after. What then is the
explanation of composition so forceful in its impassioned simplicity,
and in the light of subsequent events, so pathetic? There is but
one explanation. It came from the heart. It was the cry of the Soul
of Humanity seeking its natural affiliations. It was the language
of what Aguinaldo's early state papers always used to call the
"legitimate aspirations of" his people--legitimate aspirations which
we later strangled. The reason of the writer's earnestness is that a
few months later he helped do some of the strangling. Thirteen years
afterwards, a thorough acquaintance with the Filipino side of the
matter, derived from an examination of the information which has been
gradually accumulated and published by our government during that time,
causes him to say, "Father forgive me, for I knew not what I did." The
35,000 volunteers of 1899 knew nothing about the Filipinos or their
side of the case. We were like the deputy sheriff who goes out with
a warrant duly issued to arrest a man charged with unlawful breach
of the peace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account