The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
History
The American Occupation of the Philippines 1898-1912
Blount, James H. (James Henderson)
Philippines -- History -- 1898-1946; Philippines -- Politics and government -- 1898-1935
We think the tenacity of the Filipino purpose has been
under-estimated, and that the statements are unfounded that
volunteers are willing to engage in further service.
The censorship has compelled us to participate in this
misrepresentation by excising or altering uncontroverted statements
of facts on the plea that "they would alarm the people at home,"
or "have the people of the United States by the ears."
The men of the pen had been so long under military rule and had seen
so much of courts-martial that their document savored of military
jurisprudence. After making the above charges, it set forth what it
called "specifications." These were:
Prohibition of hospital reports; suppression of full reports
of field operations in the event of failure; numbers of heat
prostrations in the field; systematic minimization of naval
operations; and suppression of complete reports of the situation.
The paper was signed by John T. McCutcheon and Harry Armstrong,
representing the Chicago Record; O. K. Davis and P. G. MacDonnell,
representing the New York Sun; Robert M. Collins, John P. Dunning,
and L. Jones, representing the Associated Press; John F. Bass and
William Dinwiddie, representing the New York Herald; E. D. Skeene,
representing the Scripps-McRae Association; and Richard Little,
representing the Chicago Tribune. Mr. Collins, the Associated Press
representative, wrote his people an account of this whole episode,
which was also given wide publicity. After describing the committee's
interview with the General down to a certain point, he says:
But when General Otis came down to the frank admission that it
was his purpose to keep the knowledge of conditions here from the
public at home, and when the censor had repeatedly told us, in
ruling out plain statements of undisputed facts, "My instructions
are to let nothing go that can hurt the Administration," we
concluded that protest was justifiable.
Collins had written what he considered a conservative review of
the situation in June, saying reinforcements were needed. Of the
suppression of this he says:
The censor's comment (I made a note of it) was: "Of course we all
know that we are in a terrible mess out here, but we don't want the
people to get excited about it. If you fellows will only keep quiet
now we will pull through in time [232] without any fuss at home!"
Mr. Collins's letter proceeds: "When I went to see him [Otis] he
repeated the same old story about the insurrection going to pieces."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account