Simplicity is best established at the two opposite extremes of size:
astronomy and the atom. The latter, however, is much more significant
for our inquiry, since the simplicity of astronomy may result from
averaging. As we saw in Part I., the theory of the atom amounts,
broadly, to this: An atom is composed of electrons and protons, the
latter being all in the nucleus, the former partly in the nucleus
(except in hydrogen), partly planetary. The number of protons in the
nucleus gives the atomic weight; the excess of the number of protons
over that of electrons in the nucleus gives the atomic number. When
the atom is unelectrified, the number of planetary electrons is equal
to the atomic number. If the quantum theory is correct, an atom has a
certain number of characters, each measured by integers called quantum
numbers, which are always small. It has also a property called energy,
which is a function of the quantum numbers; and in connection with each
of the quantum numbers there is a periodic process which is subject to
quantum rules. Each quantum number is capable of changing suddenly from
one integer to another. When the atom is left to itself, these changes
will only be such as to diminish the energy, but when it is receiving
energy from[Pg 235] elsewhere the changes may increase the energy. All this,
however, is more or less hypothetical. What we really know about is the
interchange of energy between the atom and the surrounding space; here
there are simple laws as to the form the radiant energy will take. But
there are at present no laws determining when quantum changes
will take place in the atom, though the changes that are possible are a
definite known set.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account