HITHERTO we have been taking perception as our starting-point, and
considering how physics could be obtained as an inference from
perception. In the present chapter, I want to pursue the opposite
course, and consider how, assuming physics, percepts can find their
place in the physical world.
Let us first of all exclude certain problems which are not relevant to
this inquiry. A "percept," considered as the epistemological basis of
physics, must be a "datum"—it must be something noticed. Obviously,
therefore, whatever may be true of percepts in general, those which
afford empirical premisses for physics have to be "known." But it
is unnecessary for us to define "knowing": for physics, only the
percepts are important, and our relation to them may be taken for
granted. Similarly we need not consider whether, when we perceive,
the occurrence is relational, involving a percept and a percipient,
or whether the occurrence of the percept is all that happens at the
moment, and its "mental" character is conferred by memory (in its most
general sense). Such psychological questions need not concern us. What
I wish to discuss is the physical status of percepts, i.e.
of patches of colour, noises, smells, hardnesses, etc., as well as
perceived spatial relations. And in this discussion I am now assuming
ordinary physics, subject to the latitude of interpretation explained
in Chapter I.
Dr Whitehead's books are a protest against the "bifurcation of nature"
which has resulted from the causal theory of perception. With this
protest I am in complete agreement. Locke's belief, that the primary
qualities belong to the object[Pg 258] and the secondary to the percipient,
has been that of science in practice, whatever individual scientific
men may have thought in their philosophic moments. The view which I
wish to advocate is quite different. I hold that the world is very full
of events, that often a group of these events, or some characteristic
which the members of the group possess in varying degrees, is such as
to suggest arrangement in an order, generally a symmetrical order about
a centre—e.g. the percepts of different people when they look
at a penny may be ordered by their size and by their shape. The orders
derived from different sources are roughly identical: e.g. if
we move so as to make the big drum look larger, we also move so as to
make it sound louder. In this way we construct a space containing both
percipients and physical objects; but percepts have a twofold location
in this space, namely that of the percipient and that of the physical
object. Keeping one half of this location fixed, we obtain the view of
the world from a given place; keeping the other half fixed, we obtain
the views of a given physical object from different places. The first
of these is a percipient, the second is a physical object. But the
first half of this statement is to be taken with a grain of salt.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account