In analysis situs, both points and neighbourhoods are given.
We, on the other hand, wish to define our points in terms of "events"
where "events" will have a one-one correspondence with certain
neighbourhoods. We want our "events" to correspond with neighbourhoods
which are above a certain minimum and below a certain maximum when, at
a later stage, the empirical metric is introduced. We have to assign
to our events such properties as will enable us to define the points
of a topological space as classes of events, and the neighbourhoods of
the points as classes of points. But we have to remember that we do not
want to construct merely a topological space: what we want to construct
is the four-dimensional space-time of the general theory of relativity.
The following illustration will serve to introduce the problem.
Consider a three-dimensional Euclidean numerical space, i.e. the
manifold of all ordered triads of real numbers (, , ),
with the usual definition of distance. Consider, in this space, all the
spheres having a given radius and having centres whose co-ordinates are
rational. The number of such spheres is . Let us define
a group of these spheres as "co-punctual" if it is such that every
four chosen out of the group have a common region; and let us define
a co-punctual group as "punctual" if it cannot be enlarged without
ceasing to be co-punctual. Then there is a one-one correspondence
between the original points of our space and the punctual groups of
spheres. Consequently the punctual groups of spheres form a Euclidean
space. If the spheres are all distorted in any continuous way,[Pg 299] they
will still enable us to construct punctual groups in the same way, and
the manifold of punctual groups will still have all the topological
properties which are possessed by a three-dimensional Euclidean space.
Therefore if we are to use this method of constructing points out
of "events," we shall have to assume that, in the resulting space,
there is a possible metric according to which the points of which a
given event is a member always form a spherical volume. Although this
is expressed in metrical language, it is in reality a topological
property, since it is unaffected by continuous deformation. It must be
possible to express it in non-metrical language, though I must confess
that I lack the necessary skill.
I propose, therefore, to regard events as occupying regions of
space-time which, in some possible metric, are spheres so far as their
space-dimensions are concerned, and between a certain maximum and a
certain minimum so far as their time-dimension is concerned. The region
"occupied" by an event is the class of points of which it is a member.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account