The proof still holds if we only assume that all events
co-punctual with a given quintet can be well ordered.
Given any class of events , let be the class of those
events which are co-punctual with a. Then by definition a is a point
if . The necessary and sufficient condition that all
the members of a should have a point in common is that a should
be contained in . This condition is necessary, for, if
is a point and is contained in , it
follows that is contained in , and that
, so that is contained in . The
proof that the condition is sufficient is longer; it is as follows.
If , is a point. If not, let denote the part
of which is outside . Using again the -series of all
events, put
and so on, as long as possible. If , precedes
in the -order. Hence, as before, there must come a
stage when no fresh 's can be constructed. If is the
class consisting of a together with all the 's yielded by the
method, is a point. For (1) all the quintets in
are co-punctual, by the construction; (2) a term co-punctual with all
the quartets of cannot be later than all the 's,
because if there were such a term we could construct more 's; (3)
such a term cannot be[Pg 302] earlier than some member of because,
if it were, it would have been chosen as the of that stage in
the construction; hence no event outside is co-punctual with
every quartet of . Hence is a point.
To say that a collection of events have a point in common is to say
that the collection is part (or the whole) of the class which is the
point. Conversely, a collection of events may contain a sub-class which
is a point; the necessary and sufficient condition for this is that
should be contained in , where is
the collection in question. The proof proceeds exactly as before, if
we now make mean the part of which is not contained in
.
A group of events a is "co-punctual" if is contained in
, and a "point" is a co-punctual group which cannot be
enlarged without ceasing to be co-punctual.
A few purely logical properties of points may be noted. Given any
two classes and , if is contained in
, then is contained in . Hence
if and are points and is contained
in , and are identical; for in that
case and are respectively identical with
and , and therefore if is contained in
, is contained in , so that and
are identical.
Every co-punctual group of events contains at least one point. This has
already been proved, since to say that a is a co-punctual group is to
say that a is contained in .
It may be taken that, in general, there are a number of points of which
any given event is a member. Such a set of points will fill a "region,"
but not every region will be the set of points to which some one event
belongs. This topic, however, cannot be dealt with until we have
discussed space-time order.
FOOTNOTES:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account