We will now define a set of points as "collinear" if every pair of the
set are connected, and every triad , ,
are such that either is contained in , or
is contained in . We will define a set of
points as a "line" if (1) it is collinear, (2) it is not contained in
any larger collinear group with the same extremities. It will be seen
that this definition is analogous to that of points. We may define
a set of events[Pg 307] as "co-punctual" when every quintet of the set are
co-punctual; and we can then define a set of events as a "point"
when (1) it is co-punctual, (2) it is not contained in any larger
co-punctual group. This way of stating our previous definition of
"points" brings out the analogy.
The "lines" that we are defining are not to be supposed "straight";
straightness is a notion wholly foreign to the geometry we are
developing. Perhaps it might be better to call them "routes"; but there
is no harm in calling them "lines" provided we remember that they are
not supposed to be straight. For the present, we shall not be concerned
with lines, but only with collinear groups of points.
Let us define a set of points as "-collinear" if (1) every
pair of the set is connected; (2) given any two, , ,
either is between or , or is
between and . We shall want such axioms as will
enable us to show that such a set of points is collinear, not
merely -collinear, and that their order is independent of
. It is obvious that, if we put before
whenever is between and , we obtain a serial
order of any set of points which is -collinear. But to insure
that the order shall be independent of we require the
following three axioms:
(1) If , , , are points, and
is contained in , and is
contained in , and and are distinct, then
is not contained in .
(2) If is contained in , and is
contained in , than is contained in the sum
of and . (It follows at once that is
contained in .)
(3) If is contained in , and
is contained in , then is contained in the sum
of and . (It follows at once that is
contained in .)
The practical effects of these three axioms are:
[Pg 308]
(1) If and are between and , and
is between and , then is not between
and .
(2) If is between and , and is
between and , then and are between
and .
(3) If is between and , and is
between and , then is between and
.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account