This argument, however, hardly warrants us in assuming events inside
an electron. If we assume an electron of the Rutherford type, we shall
have to say that, if anything does take place inside the electron,
we can know nothing about it. No physical process passes through the
electron, so that the inside, if it exists, is a prison from which
nothing can escape. No event inside an electron can be compresent with
an event outside it; consequently, according to the theory of Chapter
XXIX., no line can cross the boundary of an electron. What goes on
inside, if anything does, is irrelevant to the rest of the universe,
and is not really in the same space-time as what-goes on outside.
Now the world of physics is intended to be a causally interconnected
world, and must be such if it is not to be a groundless fairy tale,
since our inferences depend upon causal laws. Therefore if anything
occurs which is causally isolated, we cannot include it in physics.
We have no ground whatever for saying that nothing is causally
isolated, but we can never have ground for saying: Such-and-such a
causally isolated event exists. The physical world is the world which
is causally continuous with percepts, and what is not so continuous
lies outside physics. Thus if[Pg 326] anything occurs inside an electron,
such an occurrence does not belong to the world of physics. It would
seem to follow that, if the electron is to have a definite position in
space-time, it must be either a point or a hole. The former, however,
is physically unsatisfactory, and the latter seems scarcely capable of
an intelligible interpretation. Thus the Rutherford type of electron
raises problems, however we may interpret it.
The Heisenberg electron offers a way out of these difficulties. This
electron is not in a definite place, and nothing happens inside it.
It is essentially a collection of radiations observable in other
places than that in which the electron would formerly have been said
to be. Thus the electron is reduced to a law as to occurrences in a
certain region. We cannot say, on this view, that the electron is a
point, or that it is a certain finite region, or that it is a hole;
it is, so to speak, something of a different logical type, connected
with a region through the fact that the radiations concerned have
diminishing intensity as we pass away from this region, but not capable
of accurate correlation with either a region or a point. Thus on
this view matter consists merely of laws as to occurrences in "empty"
space.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account