revolves in its circular orbit; the change is only with reference
to other bodies. Why not regard the state of affairs as static, but
possessed of a certain amount of energy? Energy may be altered in
amount by a change of axes, and is not an invariant property of the
system; but reference to the outside world here is less serious, since
the only purpose served by the energy of the atom is to provide physics
with something which can be radiated into the outer world or absorbed
from it. That is to say, energy is required only as something whose
changes govern the causal relations of the atom with the outer world.
This point of view is essentially that of the Heisenberg theory.
There are several apparent difficulties in such a view. In the first
place, the formula for energy obtained on the assumption that the
electron revolves gives exactly the changes of energy required to
account for spectroscopic phenomena; the Bohr-Sommerfeld theory
agrees with observation so minutely that its formula for energy must
be accepted. Of course we could say that the energy just happens to
be what it would be if the electron revolved in one of the quantum
orbits; but this would seem an almost miraculous coincidence. This,
however, is not the strongest argument, which is that[Pg 359] derived from the
quantum principle. The quantum principle in its older form can only be
applied to periodic processes; if it is to apply, as we find that it
does, to the interchange of energy between light and the atom, we must
assume, if we adhere to the older theory, that within the atom there is
something that can be called a "frequency," i.e. something which
is periodic, which compels us to admit that, within an atom in a steady
state, there is a recurring process whose formal properties are those
which would be exhibited by a revolution of the electron, and perhaps
also by a rotation.
If we adhere to the Bohr theory, what can be supposed to be really
occurring? If relative motion were all that was taking place, we should
have either to find an interpretation for the spinning electron, or
else to say that, taking axes fixed relatively to any large body, the
line joining the electron to the proton rotates rapidly; any large body
will do, since none rotates with an angular velocity comparable to that
of the electron. But why should the electron be interested in this
fact? Why should its capacity for emitting light be connected with it?
There must be something happening where the electron is, if the process
is to be intelligible. This brings us back to Maxwell's equations, as
governing what is occurring in the medium. And there must be a rhythmic
character in the events occurring where the electron is, if we are to
avoid all the troubles of action at a distance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account