The view which naturally suggests itself as a point of departure is
something like this: Given two groups of co-punctual events, it may
happen that at least one member of one group has a causal relation to
at least one member of the other group; in that case, the interval
between the two groups is time-like. If causality is a matter of
discontinuous transitions, one might expect that the magnitude of the
interval would be measured by the number of intermediate transitions.
Again, it may happen that no member of one group has a causal relation
to any member of the other, but that both contain members having causal
relations to a member of a third group. In that case, the interval
will be space-like, and again one might suppose that the number of
intermediate links would determine the magnitude of the interval.
This represents what might be hoped, but as it stands it is unduly
simple, and open to obvious objections. Let us see, therefore,
whether it is possible to answer the objections, or to introduce such
modifications as will obviate them.
First, let us be clear as to what we mean by a causal relation.
There is a causal relation whenever two events, or two groups of
events of which one at least is co-punctual, are related[Pg 368] by a law
which allows something to be inferred about the one from the other.
Formerly, one would have supposed that everything about the later
event could be inferred from a sufficient number of antecedents;
but in view of the explosive and apparently spontaneous character
of radio-activity and quantum changes, we must be content with a
more modest definition so far as this point is concerned. In another
respect, however, our definition is less modest than it would formerly
have been. In classical dynamics, causal laws connect accelerations
with configurations, so that from the present state of a small region
we cannot accurately infer anything as to what will be happening there
after a finite time. Quanta have altered this: we can associate the
light radiated from an atom with its causal origin, until it hits other
matter; we can associate the state of the atom after the emission of
the light with its state before, until it undergoes another quantum
change. In fact, as we saw in the preceding chapter, we can analyze
the course of nature into a set of steady events and rhythms with
causal relations governing the "transactions" in which rhythms undergo
changes. The above definition was framed with these considerations in
mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account