But we must deal with space-like intervals before we can decide whether
the above theory of time-like intervals will do. It is to be observed
that space-like intervals are obtained by calculation from time-like
intervals. Let us imagine the following ideal experiment: An astronomer
on the sun sends a message to an earthly mirror, and an astronomer
on the earth sends one to a solar mirror. Each observes the time of
departure and return of his own message, and the time of arrival of
the other's message. Each finds that the other's message is received
at a time half-way between the arrival and departure of his own
message. They compare notes, and discover this fact about each other's
observations. They will conclude that, according to the reckonings of
both, the two messages were despatched simultaneously, and that the
measure of the space-like interval between the despatch of the two
messages is half the time between the despatch and return of either,
i.e. about eight minutes. We may re-state the general method
involved as follows: Let us have two transactions and
connected by a number of causal routes, all going straight from
to ; and let the longest of these consist of events. Suppose
that there is another transaction such that its later event
extends to , and that there is no longer causal route from
to , nor any causal route at all from to . Here
corresponds to the sending of the signal from the earth, to the
sending of the signal from the sun, and to the arrival of the
solar signal at the terrestrial observatory. The question is: What is
to be the interval between and ? There cannot be a causal
route from to , because if there were it could be prolonged
to , and would be longer than the single event which extends from
to , contra hyp. Thus no causal series connects
and ; there is a causal series connecting and ;
and is a transaction that begins an event which ends in the
transaction . In these circumstances, we say that the interval
between and [Pg 371] is of a different kind from that between
and , but has the same numerical measure. The fact that this
definition works is what appears as the constant velocity of light.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account