It will be seen that, according to the above, intervals are discrete,
and are always measured by integers. There is, so far as I know, no
empirical evidence for or against this view. If the integers concerned
were very large, the phenomena would be sensibly the same as if
intervals could vary continuously. I do not put forward the theory
with any confidence in it as it stands, but rather to suggest to men
with more physical competence the possibility of great changes in our
picture of the world without rejecting anything probably true. In
order to bring out this point, I shall now re-state the theory without
interposing argumentative justifications.
The world, it is suggested, consists of a number of events, each
involving no change within itself, but each connected with earlier
and later events by quantum or other laws which enable us to regard
the earlier as the cause and the later as the effect. The quantum
transition I call a "transaction." A transaction is subject to laws
as to the conservation of energy and as to action. Events may be
compresent, and one event may be compresent with a number of others
which are[Pg 373] separated by transitions; in that case, the one event is
said to last for a long time. We can even obtain a continuous time in
our theory, if the number of events compresent with a given event is
infinite, and their beginnings and ends do not synchronize, i.e.
one of them may be compresent with two others which are not compresent
with each other. But I see no reason to suppose that the number of
events compresent with a given event is infinite, or to desire a theory
which makes time continuous; I therefore lay no stress upon this
possibility.
In a transaction, or during a rhythm, the causal antecedent may consist
of more than one event, and so may the causal consequent; but the
events which constitute the causal antecedent must all be co-punctual,
and so must those which constitute the causal consequent. Any event
of the antecedent group will be called a "parent" of any event of the
consequent group. When two events are connected by a chain of events,
each of which is a parent of the next, the one is said to be an
"ancestor" of the other, and the other a "descendant" of the one. Two
events may be connected by many causal chains, but all will consist of
a finite number of events, and we assume that, in the case of any two
given events, there is a maximum to the number of generations in the
various lines of descent connecting them. This maximum number is the
measure of "interval" when the interval is time-like. When the interval
is space-like, the definition of interval is slightly more complicated.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account