If, as Weyl assumes, infinitesimal distances which have one end in
common are comparable, this must be taken to mean that two small
finite distances are capable of a resemblance which may be called
"quasi-equality," which grows more nearly complete resemblance as
the distance grows smaller. We may assume, as before, that, given a
point and a definite route from to , there will
be one definite point on this route such that is
more nearly equal to than is any other distance by on the
route in question. We shall then say that and are
"quasi-equal." Take also ... quasi-equal, and ,
... quasi-equal. In this way we can construct a co-ordinate
mesh with axes , . And we can now construct what will be
in effect straight lines through : take all the points
which are the corners opposite to of quasi-parallelograms
, for different initial points , subject
to quasi-equality between and . These points may
be regarded as forming the quasi-straight line whose equation is
. (Irrationals can be dealt with by the
usual methods.) This quasi-straight line will start from in a[Pg 120]
certain direction, and may, for differential purposes, be regarded as
really a straight line. It is not worth while to proceed further, since
it is obvious that we have the necessary material.
Degrees of similarity may be, in a sense, measured by
quasi-transitiveness. Suppose that , ,
, ... each have quasi-equality with the next. It may or
may not happen that has quasi-equality with .
One may presume that this will happen if and are
very small and is not very large. Similarly, or rather a
fortiori, we cannot infer that has quasi-equality with
. The larger the value of for which such an inference
remains true, the closer is the resemblance between and
or between and . It is to be assumed
that, by continually diminishing and the number of
steps for which the inference is permitted can be increased without
finite limit.
If the above is in any degree valid, it would seem that, if space-time
is continuous, spatio-temporal measurement depends theoretically upon
qualitative similarity, capable of varying degrees, between relations
of pairs of points. It is not suggested that the analysis cannot be
carried further, but only that this is a valid stage in the process of
explaining what is meant by the quantitative character of intervals and
by their measurement as numerical multiples of units.
[Pg 121]
CHAPTER XIII
MATTER AND SPACE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account