dotage without a fever, having for his ordinary companions, fear and
sadness, without any apparent occasion. So doth Laurentius, cap. 4.
Piso. lib. 1. cap. 43. Donatus Altomarus, cap. 7. art. medic.
Jacchinus, in com. in lib. 9. Rhasis ad Almansor, cap. 15. Valesius,
exerc. 17. Fuschius, institut. 3. sec. 1. c. 11. &c. which common
definition, howsoever approved by most, [1028]Hercules de Saxonia will
not allow of, nor David Crucius, Theat. morb. Herm. lib. 2. cap. 6. he
holds it insufficient: as [1029]rather showing what it is not, than
what it is: as omitting the specific difference, the phantasy and
brain: but I descend to particulars. The summum genus is dotage, or
anguish of the mind, saith Aretaeus; of the principal parts, Hercules
de Saxonia adds, to distinguish it from cramp and palsy, and such
diseases as belong to the outward sense and motions [depraved] [1030]to
distinguish it from folly and madness (which Montaltus makes angor
animi, to separate) in which those functions are not depraved, but
rather abolished; [without an ague] is added by all, to sever it from
frenzy, and that melancholy which is in a pestilent fever. (Fear and
sorrow) make it differ from madness: [without a cause] is lastly
inserted, to specify it from all other ordinary passions of [fear and
sorrow.] We properly call that dotage, as [1031]Laurentius interprets
it, when some one principal faculty of the mind, as imagination, or
reason, is corrupted, as all melancholy persons have. It is without a
fever, because the humour is most part cold and dry, contrary to
putrefaction. Fear and sorrow are the true characters and inseparable
companions of most melancholy, not all, as Her. de Saxonia, Tract. de
posthumo de Melancholia, cap. 2. well excepts; for to some it is most
pleasant, as to such as laugh most part; some are bold again, and free
from all manner of fear and grief, as hereafter shall be declared.
SUBSECT. II.—_Of the part affected. Affection. Parties affected_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account