The Anatomy of the Human Peritoneum and Abdominal Cavity: Considered from the Standpoint of Development and Comparative AnatomyHuntington, George S. (George Sumner)
Science
The Anatomy of the Human Peritoneum and Abdominal Cavity: Considered from the Standpoint of Development and Comparative Anatomy
Huntington, George S. (George Sumner)
Abdomen; Peritoneum
3. Finally, in about four per cent. to five per cent., adult caeca, the
reduction of the wall to the left of the root of the appendix, between
this point and the ileo-colic junction, is complete. The entire caecal
pouch is formed by the dilated right wall between the ventral and
dorsolateral muscular bands. The ventral band terminates at the lower
border of the ileo-colic junction, from which the appendix appears to
arise, indicating the original apex of the foetal caecum (schema, Fig.
509, _II^e_).
This type is illustrated in the specimens shown in Figs. 533 and 534.
[Illustration: FIG. 532.--Human infant, Ileo-colic junction and caecum,
with secondary terminal sacculation. (Columbia University Museum, No.
1632.)]
[Illustration: FIG. 533.--Human adult. Ileo-colic junction and caecum;
dorsal view; dried preparation. (Columbia University Museum, No. 124.)]
[Illustration: FIG. 534.--Human adult. Ileo-colic junction and caecum;
ventral view; dried preparation. (Columbia University Museum, No. 14.)]
=III. Adult Caeca in Cases of Absence of the Appendix.=--A few instances
of congenital absence of the appendix have been observed.
A. v. Haller[9] describes the condition in the following words:
"Defuisse visa est in homine appendicula, ut tuberculum minimum
superesset."
[9] A. v. Haller, Elements physiologiae, Tom. 7, Liber 24, Sect. 3.
Fr. Arnold,[10] without describing any individual case, states that
"very rarely the appendix is entirely wanting."
[10] Fr. Arnold, Handbuch der Anat. d. Menschen. 1847. II. Bd., cloth,
p. 84.
E. Zuckerkandl,[11] reports having observed one case of absence of the
appendix.
[11] E. Zuckerkandl, "Ueber die Obliteration des Darmfortsatzes beim
Menschen." Anat. Hefte XI. (Bd. IV., Heft 1), 1894, p. 107.
J. D. Bryant,[12] reports a case in which he operated for appendicitis
but found "absolutely no appendix." "The point of tenderness was found
to be a glandular growth located posterior to the usual site of the
appendix."
[12] N. Y. Med. Journal, Vol. LXIX., No. 14, p. 508.
[Illustration: FIG. 535.--Human adult. Ileo-colic junction and caecum;
absence of appendix. (Columbia University Museum, No. 1077.)]
[Illustration: FIG. 536.--Human adult. Ileo-colic junction and caecum,
hardened _in situ_; absence of appendix. (Columbia University Museum,
No. 715.)]
Two instances of this variation are shown in Figs. 535 and 536, taken
from preparations in the Morphological Museum of Columbia University. In
both careful examination of the external as well as of the mucous
surface of the caecum demonstrated the entire absence of the appendix,
and the subjects from which they were obtained presented no scars or
other evidences of operative removal or of pathological processes. They
are both, therefore, authentic instances of complete congenital absence
of the appendix, not of so-called retro-peritoneal or hidden
appendix.[13]
[13] Cf. Quain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account