The Ancient Volcanoes of Great Britain, Volume 1 (of 2)Geikie, Archibald
History
The Ancient Volcanoes of Great Britain, Volume 1 (of 2)
Geikie, Archibald
Volcanoes -- Great Britain
At the time when the Geological Survey maps of this region were
prepared, the Cambrian and Lower Silurian rocks had not been subdivided
into the various palæontological groups which are now recognized.
Nor had any attempt been made to separate the various kinds of
contemporaneous igneous masses from each other and from the tuffs in so
extensive and complicated a mountain-region. The task undertaken by the
Survey was beset with difficulties, some of which geologists, furnished
with the advantages of a later time, can hardly perhaps realize. The
imperfections of the mapping were long ago recognized by the original
surveyors, and various corrections of them were made from time to time.
First of all, the volcanic rocks, which originally had been all massed
under one colour, were traced out separately on the ground, according
to their structure and mode of origin, and were distinguished from each
other on the maps.[132] Subsequently divisional lines were followed
out between some of the larger stratigraphical groups, the maps and
sections were still further modified, and the results were summed up in
the volume on the _Geology of North Wales_.[133] But short of actually
resurveying the whole of that rugged tract, it was impossible to bring
the maps abreast of the onward march of science. They consequently
remain, as a whole, very much as they were some thirty or forty years
ago.
[Footnote 132: _Mem. Geol. Surv._ vol. iii. 2nd edit. p. 95, note.]
[Footnote 133: Some of the modifications introduced are, I think, to
be regretted, for the earlier editions of the maps and sections are in
certain respects more accurate than the later. On this point I concur
with the criticism made by Messrs. Cole and Jennings, _Quart. Journ.
Geol. Soc._ vol. xlv. (1889), p. 436.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account