The Animal Parasites of ManFantham, Harold Benjamin
Science
The Animal Parasites of Man
Fantham, Harold Benjamin
Medical parasitology
(_b_) _Action of Baboon Serum._--Contrary to _T. gambiense_, _T.
rhodesiense_ is very susceptible to human and baboon sera. Mesnil and
Ringenbach[75] showed that a dose of 1 c.c. of baboon (_Papio anubis_)
serum cured mice infected with _T. rhodesiense_. In the same dose it
acted very feebly on _T. gambiense_.
[75] _C.R. Acad. Sci._, 153, p. 1,097.
(_c_) _Action of Human Serum._--_1 c.c._ of human serum cured _T.
rhodesiense_ mice in three out of four cases; on _T. gambiense_ mice
there was no appreciable effect.
Laveran and Nattan-Larrier[76] have shown the same, namely, that human
sera act on _T. rhodesiense_, but are quite without action on _T.
gambiense_.
[76] _C.R. Acad. Sci._, 154, p. 18.
(_d_) _Trypanolytic Reactions._--Mesnil and Ringenbach[77] have also
shown that the sera of animals (man, monkey and guinea-pig) infected
with _T. gambiense_ are trypanolytic for the homologous trypanosome,
that is, _T. gambiense_, but have no action on the heterologous
trypanosome, that is, _T. rhodesiense_.
[77] _C.R. Soc. Biol._, lxxi, p. 609.
(4) _Cross Immunity Experiments._--(_a_) Mesnil and Ringenbach[78]
immunized a monkey (_Macacus rhesus_) against _T. gambiense_. It
was inoculated with _T. rhodesiense_ on June 7, 1911; on June 27
trypanosomes appeared, the infection being slight; on July 4 it died. A
control died in ten and a half days.
[78] _C.R. Soc. Biol._, lxxi, p. 271.
(_b_) Laveran[79] immunized a goat and mice against _T. gambiense_.
When they had acquired a solid immunity, they were inoculated with _T.
rhodesiense_. They became infected like the controls.
[79] _Bull. Soc. Path. Exot._, v, pp. 26, 241.
(_c_) Laveran and Nattan-Larrier[80] immunized a ram against _T.
brucei_, it subsequently became infected with _T. rhodesiense_.
[80] _C.R. Acad. Sci._, 154, p. 18.
(_d_) Laveran[81] immunized a ram and a sheep against different strains
of T_. brucei_. Inoculated with _T. rhodesiense_ they both acquired
acute infections and died. Conclusion: _T. rhodesiense_ is not _T.
brucei_.
[81] _Bull. Soc. Path. Exot._, v, p. 101.
When the converse set of experiments is tried, namely, immunizing
an animal against _T. rhodesiense_, and then inoculating with _T.
gambiense_, the difficulty immediately arises that it is impossible
to immunize an animal against _T. rhodesiense_, owing to its
virulence. But a partial and transitory immunity to _T. rhodesiense_
can be obtained by treating the infected animal with drugs, such as
arsenophenylglycin. The results, so far as they go, seem to show that
an animal immunized against _T. rhodesiense_ is immune not only to
_T. rhodesiense_, but also to _T. gambiense_, a fact which, according
to Mesnil and Léger, does not invalidate the specificity of _T.
rhodesiense_, but tends to show that the two trypanosomes are closely
related.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account