L. Pfeiffer’s statements (1891) on the part that certain coccidia or their sporozoites played, or seemed to play, as causes of disease gave a renewed impetus to the investigation of the coccidia. The ingestion of even very numerous spores did not appear to account for the mass infection so frequently observed, even after Balbiani had confirmed the fact that there were two, and not one, sporozoites contained in every spore of the coccidia of rabbits (fig. 72). The hypothesis was therefore advanced that the sporozoites or young coccidia were able to divide once again by sporulating. The question was finally solved quite differently. R. Pfeiffer (1892) first confirmed the fact that in addition to the well-known method of sporulation in the coccidia of the rabbit that causes the infection of fresh hosts (“exogenous sporulation”), an enormous increase may follow in the already infected host in a manner that Eimer first observed in the coccidia of the intestine of the mouse (“endogenous sporulation”). It had hitherto been believed that some of the species of coccidia increased like the rabbit parasite, then known as _Coccidium oviforme_, and others like _Eimeria falciformis_, and this difference had been made the foundation of a classification. R. Pfeiffer was successful in observing the occurrence of both kinds of development in the same species, and expressed the opinion that endogenous sporulation (fig. 73), which takes place within the host, was the cause of the mass-infection that is mostly accompanied by serious consequences (fig. 74). L. Pfeiffer sought, especially, to demonstrate the correctness of this view as regards other species of coccidia and for this purpose he utilized the experiences already published. Coccidia were known to exist in a number of different hosts, and to propagate in some according to the _Coccidium_ type, in others according to the _Eimeria_ type. It therefore was reasoned that in this case it was not a question of two species belonging to different genera living side by side, with a different mode of development, but of one species, in the life of which both forms of development occurred alternately.