Barbers -- England -- London -- History -- Sources; Barbers' Company (London, England) -- History; Surgery -- England -- London -- History -- Sources
27th April, 1739. “The Court taking into their considerac͠on that
several of their By-Laws, which had been confirmed by the Lord
Chancellor and Lord Chief Justices for the time being, were in want of
alteration, by reason of the variation of the times and circumstances
of the Company and their Members since such By-Laws were made, and
several new By-Laws being also wanting for the better government of
the Company in times to come,” It was ordered that a Committee of six
should consult and draw up fresh By-Laws, to be submitted to a future
Court of Assistants, but in the result no action was taken.
1744. The long slumbering animosity between the Surgeons and the
Barbers had now reached a climax, and indeed it is a matter of surprise
that an union which had become grotesque should have existed for as
many years as it had. The Surgeons, many of whom had attained to
great eminence, naturally chafed under a system which required their
diplomas to be signed by Governors, two of whom were always Barbers,
or members of some trade or profession other than that of a Surgeon,
and with the rapid progress of science and of surgical skill and
knowledge, they felt their alliance with the Barbers a restraint upon
their advancement, as also that the exercise of their profession under
Charters and By-Laws, antiquated in form, and more adapted to the times
in which they were framed, a hindrance rather than an incitement to
further proficiency.
There is little in the records as to this disagreement, it being
tacitly agreed that neither side should place their arguments or
grievances in the books, which were their joint property.
20th December, 1744. This day the gentlemen on the Surgeons side
having made known at this Court their desire of being separated from
the gentlemen on the Barbers and that each may be made a distinct
and independent Body free from each other, and producing a Case
intended to be offered to the Honourable House of Commons praying
such separation, which being read at this Court It was agreed that
the following gentlemen on the Barbers side viz{t.}--
M{r.} Warden Negus M{r.} Parker M{r.} Maurice M{r.} Truelove and
M{r.} Haddon.
& on the Surgeons side viz{t.}--
M{r.} Serj{t} Dickins Will{m} Petty Esq{r} James Dansie Esq{re} M{r.}
Freke and M{r.} Sainthill
be a Committe appointed to meet on Monday next at the Kings Arms
Tavern in Saint Paul’s Church Yard at one of the Clock at noon to
receive the proposals from the Gentlemen on the Surgeon’s side for
such Separation, and that when they had so done that the Gentlemen on
the Barber’s side members of this Court should lay the same before
the Livery on their side, by a Meeting to be had for that purpose,
and that a Court of Assistants should be held on the Tenth day of
January next, at which time the Gentlemen on the Barber’s Side
Members of this Court, should then report their opinion and assent or
Dissent to such proposals made.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account