Barbers -- England -- London -- History -- Sources; Barbers' Company (London, England) -- History; Surgery -- England -- London -- History -- Sources
27th January, 1618. Upon the humble petic͠on unto this Companie
preferred by Thomas Shaw a pore brother of this Companie & now
lyeinge in Ludgate thereby sueing for some releife to discharge him
out of prison. It is therefore ordered by this Court that if the some
of 30{s} will discharge him out of prison it shalbe disbursed out of
the stock of this howse.
20th September, 1622. At this Court is gyven to Susan the Clarkꝭ
mayde towardꝭ her marriage 40{s} in gratuity.
At this Court it is ordered that Jones the Waterman shall have for
the hier of our barge against the lord Maio{rs} day fower poundꝭ So
as it is a large barge will hold the hole lyvery And to worke w{th} 7
or 8 oweis.[164]
[164] Oars.
31st January, 1625. It is straightly ordered by this Courte that the
pˀnte M{rs} or Governo{rs} and their successors shall take speciall
care to comence and prosecute any suite by lawe against any ignorant
imposters or other pˀsons exerciseing the arte of Chirurgery aboute
this Cittie not free of this Companye & alsoe such as shall keepe
shoppes for barbery within this Cittye being free of other Companies
& not of ours.
19th January, 1626. This daye John Mills and George Roades are chosen
to be of our Assistants for Barbars and Henry Blackley and Peter
Thorney for Surgions.
Item this Courte takeing into their considerac͠ons the fewnes of our
Livery many of them being lately dead by reason of the late greate
visitac͠on doe elect and choose John Pinder Edward Charley Edward
ffleete Robert Clarke Samuell Dye and Lewis Gossidge to be of the
Clothing of our Companye.
15th February, 1626. At this Courte it is ordered that William
Kellett do bring in his fine of vj{s} viij{d} at the next Courte
for his unseemely carriage and vile language to Walter Preist being
contrary to the ordinance and good goverment of this house, which
fine the said William Kellett here in Courte refused and said he
would not paye it.
At the same Court Priest was ordered to pay Kellett £3 which he owed
him.
8th June, 1626. Kellett, not having paid his fine, was ordered to be
dismissed out of the livery.
26th October, 1626. But becoming repentant, he made humble suit to the
Court to be reinstated, “protesting here in Courte that as he hopeth
to be saved he did not speak those wordꝭ and if he did he is very
sorroy for it,” upon which submission and payment of his fine, he was
readmitted to the livery.
23rd February, 1626. This daye upon the petic͠on of Thomas Borne and
a certificate under the hand of Docto{r} Allott that the said Borne
was a Scholler of the house in St. Johns Colledge in Cambridge it
is ordered by the Court that for one yeare ensueing he shall have
iij{li} to be paid him by M{r} Warᵭ Molins.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account