Barbers -- England -- London -- History -- Sources; Barbers' Company (London, England) -- History; Surgery -- England -- London -- History -- Sources
4th June, 1605. This daye it is ordered that Roger Kiffin shalbe
dischardged of his apprentiship w{th} Richard Bonner for that hee
wanteth meate drinck & apparrell And hee is to finde him selfe a
nother M{r} of this Company. (See 25th June.)
18th June, 1605. This daye it is ordered that John Udall shalbe
committed to the Compter for his contempt.[171]
[171] The contempt being that Udall having “put away” his Apprentice,
(_i.e._, had him locked up in Bridewell, without the leave of the
Court,) and being fined 40_s._ for that offence, had refused to pay
his fine.
25th June, 1605. Richard Bonnẽr is to bringe in his apprentices Roger
Kiffins Indenture at the next Courte or ells hee is to be comitted to
the Compter.
25th June, 1605. This daye Thomas Clemence was fined at x{s} for that
hee was not bound apprentice by the Clark of this Company.
24th September, 1605. This day it is ordered that David Vaughan
apprentice to Richard Davis shalbe pˀntlie dischardged from his said
M{r} for the residue of his terme to come for that his said M{r}
hath given him unlawfull correction as it was affirmed and hath not
trayned him up in the trade that he used being Barbinge and Surgery.
And is to bring in the Apprentices indenture att the next Courte
or ells to be comitted to the Compter for his contempt. And the
appˀntice is in the meane tyme to continue w{th} his freindꝭ And is
not to sˀve any pˀson that useth the trade of silck weavinge any more
w{th} in the liberties of London.
7th January, 1606. This day it is ordered that John Browne and his
apprentice be here at the next Courte. And he is to be comaunded
from our M{rs} to discharge his appˀntice out of Bridewell w{ch} he
holdeth there And then to be before o{r} said M{rs} at their next
Court both he and his apprentice.
14th January, 1606. John Browne is to bringe in his fine for puttinge
away his appˀntice w{th}out the M{rs} order.
5th July, 1608. This daye in the Controversie betwixt Nicholas Braye
and Humfrey Pittꝭ It is ordered for that the M{rs} doe fynde that the
Apprentice is not kept as hee ought to be but is lowsie and also his
M{r} for want of change of apparrell And that therefore wee doe not
fynde him a fit M{r} It is ordered that if the said Nicholas Braye
doe not hereafter use his apprentice in Better Order that then the
apprentice shalbe turned over to anoth{r} freeman of this Company.
23rd May, 1609. This daye Richard Tyler broughte in his fine
accordinge to a former order for puttinge awaye (_i.e._, imprisoning)
his apprentice w{th}out the M{rs} order And it was mittigated to
xx{s.}
19th November, 1611. At this Court it is ordered that John Todd shall
on the next tuesdaies Court bring in his fyne of 40{s} for that he
did not bynde an appˀntice w{ch} is now w{th} him according to the
Custome of this howse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account