Barbers -- England -- London -- History -- Sources; Barbers' Company (London, England) -- History; Surgery -- England -- London -- History -- Sources
17th January, 1644. The Court took notice of the King’s mandate, and
a very long and elaborate minute is entered to the effect that the
practice of choosing two Barbers and two Surgeons for Governors was
fraught with much inconvenience and had led to great dissensions, and
the Court referring to the Statute of Henry VII, where it is allowed
that any person free of the Company following any other profession than
that of a Barber or Surgeon should be reputed and taken as a Barber,
ordered that for the future, any Member of the Assistants, other than
a Barber or Surgeon, might be put in nomination, and that he should
be accounted a Barber. The Court were very careful to express their
loyalty to the King whilst they ignored his mandate, trusting no doubt,
that should they afterwards be called to account by the King, their
dutiful expressions towards him would serve in a measure as an excuse
for disobeying his express commands.
[Sidenote:
Mould for y{e}
Kings Evill.]
2nd July, 1639. Anthony Mould called to this Court and questioned
concerneing his practise in Surgerye, confessed that he deales onely
in swellings and Kernills & hath a licence from the Kinge to practise
the same, he hath lately taken into his Cure one George Ravenscroft
for scrophilous tumo{rs} in the neck, this Court at the said Moulds
request, hath given libertye to Mould to cure him by Michaelmas next,
& he hath promised then to present the said Geo: whole & well to this
Court.
Some nine years afterwards Mould was again before the Court in a case
of King’s evil.
21st March, 1648. Henry Ivatt complayned against Anthony Mold for
his evill practice On the Wife of the said Ivatt who being afflicted
with the Kings Evill Whereof he undertooke to cure her And for that
purpose did receive of the said Ivatt xxx{s} in hand and was to have
40{s} more when she was cured Both partyes refeered themselves to
this Court Whereupon this Court doth Order That the said Mold doth
restore xx{s} back againe to the said Ivatt Which he promised to pay
accordingly And soe all differences betweene the said parties by
theire owne consent to cease and determine.
6th February, 1646. It is this day ordered That our M{r} and M{r}
Warden Browne[207] with the other Assistants Surgeons present doe
move the Sheriffs That at the time of Execuc͠on a Body be quietly
delivered to this Companye’s officer for an Anatomy.
[207] Martin Browne, an eminent Surgeon, Master in 1653, gave the
Company a Silver loving cup and cover.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account