The Annals of WillenhallHackwood, Frederick William
History
The Annals of Willenhall
Hackwood, Frederick William
Willenhall (Walsall, England)
In 1887, soon after Mr. Fisher’s “Jubilee” in Willenhall, a public
movement was instituted, in which many Dissenters took part, to
acknowledge his fifty years of devoted service among all classes of the
community. A presentation was made to him of a silver service and his
portrait in oils—the latter the work of Thomas Hill, a native of
Wednesfield, and which now hangs on the walls of the Free Public Library.
[Picture: Decorative flower]
XX.—The Election of 1894, and Since.
Although St. Giles’s Church is known as the Parish Church, and a church
has probably been on the same site some six centuries, the church of
Willenhall is really a Proprietary Chapel of Ease, and its Incumbent
legally nothing more than a Perpetual Curate, or Curate in Charge, though
Incumbent of Willenhall, and receiving in respect of that office a very
substantial “living.” The official return set forth in Crockford’s
Clergy Directory for 1893 was: Tithe rent charge, £640, net Income,
£1,300.
Strictly, there is no St. Giles’s parish, nor any parish attached to St.
Giles’s Church, and in law the Incumbent might, if he wished, ignore the
so-called parish so long as he performed satisfactorily certain duties in
the church. The unappropriated district, commonly known as St. Giles’s
parish, includes that part of Willenhall which has not been allocated to
the properly constituted parishes (or ecclesiastical districts) of St.
Stephen’s, St. Anne’s, and Holy Trinity, Short Heath, plus the entire
civil parish of Bentley—the whole being really part of the ecclesiastical
parish of Wolverhampton.
The position is extraordinarily anomalous. The Incumbent is elected by
the inhabitants of the township of Willenhall being sufficient
householders and having lands of inheritance there; that is to say, the
voters must be freeholders as well as householders. Litigation followed
the choice of the Rev. William Moreton in 1788, and also the election of
the Rev. G. H. Fisher in 1834. It is understood that this system of
“patronage” has been condemned by the Privy Council; and that application
has been made for the proper constitution of a St. Giles’s parish, but
the Bishop demands a quid pro quo.
All attempts to create a Parish of Willenhall have, so far, utterly
failed. The existing system of patronage is always the obstacle, and
nothing will induce the voters either to sell or to surrender their
rights in the Advowson.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account