The antiquities of Bridgnorth : $b with some historical notices of the town and castleBellett, George
History
The antiquities of Bridgnorth : $b with some historical notices of the town and castle
Bellett, George
Bridgnorth (England) -- Antiquities
On the 10th of June there was a farther order on the subject. “At a
Comon Hall it was agreed that the Chamberlain of the towne should cause
the Towne Hall to be taken down with all convenient speed according
to the foregoing order from Sir Lewis Kirke, governor of the said
towne, and other above-named Commissioners, and that the Chamberlain
shall make sale thereof for the most benefit of the towne, and what
they cannot sell thereof, to cause the timber which shall remain to be
carried into the church, there to remain until further use shall be
for the same for the towne. And the New House is in the like manner
to be taken down if needs require. And it is further also agreed that
the Towne’s Bonds and writings concerning the towne, which are in the
New House, shall be left with the Towne Clerk, or in any other place
which the Bailiffs and he shall think fit. And if they shall happen
to be taken from them the towne is to bear the loss of them, and not
they, because they are not able to warrant them, nor anything else that
they have of their own, as it is very well known both to the towne and
country, whereof they are all very sensible, this towne being every day
in danger of being taken.” The Town Hall, which, as it appears by a
deed, dated Oct. 20th, 1645, stood upon the site of the old Poor House,
of St. Leonard’s Parish, outside the North Gate, was accordingly pulled
down forthwith, and in the month following, July, 1645, the New House
was also pulled down. [_Apley Papers._]
Four days after the date of this order, was fought another great
battle, at Naseby in Northamptonshire—fatal to the fortunes of the
King; for here again, through the impetuous and fiery temper of Prince
Rupert, who could brook no delay when an enemy was in sight, and listen
to no counsel that was not prompted by a spirit as daring as his own,
the King’s troops were hurried on prematurely to the attack, and though
they displayed a courage worthy of the Cavalier who led them, they
were eventually routed, and suffered a signal defeat. All the cannon,
ammunition, and baggage, were taken, and the whole of the infantry
made prisoners. The King in person had the command of the main body,
and, as Whitelock observes, “displayed in this action all the conduct
of a prudent general, and all the valour of a stout soldier;” [_Hume,
Vol._ VII, _p. 54_.] but he was forced at last by the solicitations of
his friends to retire, leaving the insurgents masters of the field.
He retreated to Lichfield, thence to Bewdley, thence to Raglan and
Chepstow Castles, and afterwards to Wales, uncertain as to the best
place for collecting the remnant of his army, and for providing for his
own personal safety.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account