The antiquities of Bridgnorth : $b with some historical notices of the town and castleBellett, George
History
The antiquities of Bridgnorth : $b with some historical notices of the town and castle
Bellett, George
Bridgnorth (England) -- Antiquities
These ALMES HOUSES, for ten poor Widdows of this upper Town, were Built
and Endowed by FRANCIS PALMER, late RECTOR of SANDY, in the County of
Bedford, who had an affection to this Place, his Mother being buried
in this Church, and was Sister to Colonel FRANCIS BILLINGSLEY, late
of Abbots Astley, slain in this Church Yard, in the Service of KING
CHARLES ye first.”
[60] These particulars I have collected partly from the Blakeway
Papers, and partly from the puritan tract of “The Burning Bush not
consumed.”
But it is time to return to the narrative of the siege. The infantry
of the Parliamentary forces having succeeded in the encounter with
the King’s troops in the Church Yard, immediately opened the North
Gate, and gave admittance to the cavalry; and before this combined
body of horse and foot, the Royalists were compelled to retreat into
the Castle. On their way they were annoyed by the inhabitants of the
town, who hurled stones and other missiles on them, from the stalls and
piazzas which lined the High Street. It is evident that a bad feeling
had sprung up between them, from what cause is not exactly known. I
have seen documents which clearly prove that some Roundheads had been
for a time in the town, secretly plotting against the cause of the
King; and these very likely stirred up ill will between the soldiers
and the inhabitants, which, as other documents clearly prove, was
aggravated by the rude license which soldiers under such circumstances
often give themselves.[61] Whitelock states (_p. 206_) that the town
had refused to bring in a month’s provisions for the troops, which
had been expected, and this was a wrong which no doubt deepened the
feeling of resentment already existing. To this, some suppose is to
be attributed the destruction of the town by fire, which the King’s
troops effected after getting into the Castle. This act on their part,
however, may have been, one, simply of self defence; for they very
probably thought, that if the enemy obtained possession of the town as
it stood, it would give them great advantage in carrying on the siege
of the Castle, and of this advantage they were determined to deprive
them. They therefore at once set fire to the town. The first house that
caught fire was one in Listley Street, which stood near the northern
postern of the Castle, and from this it spread till it reached the
middle of High Street; there it was extinguished by the exertions of
the Parliamentary troops. The garrison of the Castle made a second
attempt on Easter Tuesday, and completely succeeded. Unhappily for the
ancient Church of St. Leonard’s, the rebel army had converted it into
a powder magazine—for in the rude time of war but little respect is
paid to the consecrated houses of God, provided they can be turned to
any advantage; and they who scrupled not to make Worcester Cathedral a
stable for their cavalry horses, would not hesitate to turn the Parish
Church of St. Leonard’s into an ammunition store. But it proved fatal
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account