The Apology of the Augsburg ConfessionMelanchthon, Philipp
Religion
The Apology of the Augsburg Confession
Melanchthon, Philipp
Lutheran Church -- Catechisms
They oppose the example of Adam, and also of David, who was punished
for his adultery. From these examples they derive the universal rule
that peculiar temporal punishments in the remission of sins
correspond to individual sins. It has been said before that saints
suffer punishments, which are works of God; they suffer contrition or
terrors, they also suffer other common afflictions. Thus, for
example, some suffer punishments of their own that have been imposed
by God. And these punishments pertain in no way to the keys because
the keys neither can impose nor remit them, but God, without the
ministry of the keys, imposes and remits them [as He will].
Neither does the universal rule follow: Upon David a peculiar
punishment was imposed, therefore, in addition to common afflictions,
there is another punishment of purgatory, in which each degree
corresponds to each sin. Where does Scripture teach that we cannot
be freed from eternal death except by the compensation of certain
punishments in addition to common afflictions? But, on the other
hand, it most frequently teaches that the remission of sins occurs
freely for Christ's sake, that Christ is the Victor of sin and death.
Therefore the merit of satisfaction is not to be patched upon this.
And although afflictions still remain, yet Scripture interprets these
as the mortifications of present sin [to kill and humble the old
Adam], and not as the compensations of eternal death or as prices for
eternal death.
Job is excused that he was not afflicted on account of past evil
deeds, therefore afflictions are not always punishments or signs of
wrath. Yea, terrified consciences are to be taught that other ends
of afflictions are more important [that they should learn to regard
troubles far differently, namely, as signs of grace], lest they think
that they are rejected by God when in afflictions they see nothing
but God's punishment and anger. The other more important ends are to
be considered namely, that God is doing His strange work so that He
may he able to do His own work, etc., as Isaiah teaches in a long
discourse, chap. 28. And when the disciples asked concerning the
blind man who sinned, John 9, 2. 3, Christ replies that the cause of
his blindness is not sin, but that the works of God should be made
manifest in him. And in Jeremiah, 49, 12, it is said: They whose
judgment was not to drink of the cup have assuredly drunken. Thus
the prophets and John the Baptist and other saints were killed.
Therefore afflictions are not always punishments for certain past
deeds, but they are the works of God, intended for our profit, and
that the power of God might be made more manifest in our weakness
[how He can help in the midst of death].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account