The Apology of the Augsburg ConfessionMelanchthon, Philipp
Religion
The Apology of the Augsburg Confession
Melanchthon, Philipp
Lutheran Church -- Catechisms
imagine, wrought in mortal sin. And here belongs the example of the
Ninevites, Jonah 3, 10, who by their repentance (we speak of the
entire repentance) were reconciled to God, and obtained the favor
that their city was not destroyed.
Moreover, the making mention, by the Fathers, of satisfaction, and
the framing of canons by the councils, we have said above was a
matter of church-discipline instituted on account of the example.
Nor did they hold that this discipline is necessary for the remission
either of the guilt or of the punishment. For if some of them made
mention of purgatory, they interpret it not as compensation for
eternal punishment [which only Christ makes], not as satisfaction,
but as purification of imperfect souls. Just as Augustine says that
venial [daily] offenses are consumed i.e., distrust towards God and
other similar dispositions are mortified. Now and then the writers
transfer the term satisfaction from the rite itself or spectacle, to
signify true mortification. Thus Augustine says: True satisfaction
is to cut off the causes of sin, i.e., to mortify the flesh, likewise
to restrain the flesh, not in order that eternal punishments may be
compensated for but so that the flesh may not allure to sin.
Thus concerning restitution, Gregory says that repentance is false if
it does not satisfy those whose property we have taken. For he who
still steals does not truly grieve that he has stolen or robbed. For
he is a thief or robber, so long as he is the unjust possessor of the
property of another. This civil satisfaction is necessary, because
it is written Eph. 4, 28: Let him that stole, steal no more.
Likewise Chrysostom says: In the heart, contrition; in the mouth,
confession; in the work, entire humility. This amounts to nothing
against us. Good works ought to follow repentance, it ought to be
repentance, not simulation, but a change of the entire life for the
better.
Likewise, the Fathers wrote that it is sufficient if once in life
this public or ceremonial penitence occur, about which the canons
concerning satisfactions have been made. Therefore it can be
understood that they held that these canons are not necessary for the
remission of sins. For in addition to this ceremonial penitence,
they frequently wish that penitence be rendered otherwise, where
canons of satisfactions were not required.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account