[10.18] Gal. vi. 11; Rom. xvi. 22. [10.19] II. Cor. xi. 6. [10.20] _Acts_ xxi. 40. I have elsewhere explained the sense of the word Ἑβραïστί. _Hist. des Langes Sémit._ ii. 1, 5; iii. 1, 2. [10.21] _Acts_ xxvi. 14. [10.22] I. Cor. xv. 33, Cf. Meinecke. _Menandri fragm._ p. 75. [10.23] Tit. i. 12; _Acts_ xvii. 28. The authenticity of the Epistle to Titus is very doubtful. As to the discourse in chapter xvii. of the _Acts_, it is the work of the author of the _Acts_ rather than of St. Paul. [10.24] The verse quoted from Aratus (Phænom. 5) is really found in Cleanthes (_Hymn to Jupiter_, 5). Both are doubtless taken from some anonymous religious hymn. [10.25] Gal. i. 14. [10.26] _Acts_ xvii. 22, etc. Observe note 23. [10.27] See _Vie de Jésus_, p. 72. [10.28] _Acts_ xviii. 3. [10.29] _Ibid._ xviii. 3; I. Cor. iv. 12; I. Thess. ii. 9; II. Thess. iii. 8. [10.30] _Acts_ xxiii. 16. [10.31] II. Cor. viii. 18, 22; xii. 18. [10.32] Rom. xvi. 7, 11, 21. [10.33] See above all the Epistle to Philemon. [10.34] Gal. v. 12; Phil. iii. 2. [10.35] II. Cor. x. 10. [10.36] _Acta Pauli et Theclæ_ 3, in Tischendorf, _Acta Apost._, apocr. (Leipzig, 1851), p. 41, and the notes (an ancient text perhaps, the original spoken of by Tertullian); the _Philopatris_, 12 (composed about 363); Malala Chronogr. p. 257, edit. Bonn; Nicephore, _Hist. Eccl._ ii. 37. All these passages, above all that of _Philopatris_, admit that these were ancient portraits. [10.37] I. Cor. ii. 1, etc.; II. Cor. x. 1, 2, 10; xi. 6. [10.38] I. Cor. ii. 3; II. Cor. x. 10. [10.39] II. Cor. xi. 30; xii. 5, 9, 10. [10.40] I. Cor. ii. 3; II. Cor. i. 8, 9; x. 10; xi. 30; xii. 5, 9, 10; Gal. iv. 13, 14. [10.41] II. Cor. xii. 7-10. [10.42] I. Cor. vii. 7, 8, and the context. [10.43] I. Cor. vii. 7, 8; ix. 5. This second passage is far from being demonstrative. Phil. iv. 3, would imply the contrary. Comp. Clement of Alexandria, _Strom._ iii. 6, and Euseb. _Hist. Eccl._ iii. 30. The passage I. Cor. vii. 7, 8 alone has any weight on this point. [10.44] I. Cor. vii. 7-9. [10.45] _Acts_ xxii. 3; xxvi. 4. [10.46] Ibid. xxii. 3. Paul does not speak of this matter in certain parts of his Epistles where he would naturally mention him (Phil. iii. 5). There is an absolute contradiction between the principles of Gamaliel (_Acts_ v. 34, etc.) and the conduct of Paul before his conversion. [10.47] Gal. i. 13, 14; _Acts_ xxii. 3; xxvi. 5. [10.48] II. Cor. v. 16, does not implicate him. The passages _Acts_ xxii. 3, xxvi. 4, give reason to believe that Paul was at Jerusalem at the same time as Jesus. But it does not follow that he saw him. [10.49] _Acts_ xxii. 4, 19; xxvi. 10, 11. [10.50] Ibid. xxvi. 11.