The archæology and prehistoric annals of ScotlandWilson, Daniel, Sir
History
The archæology and prehistoric annals of Scotland
Wilson, Daniel, Sir
Scotland -- Antiquities
engaging parties joined hands through the perforation in the stone;
and though it is difficult to decide how much of the tradition may be
ascribable to modern embellishment and the adaptation of a genuine
heirloom of primitive superstition to the preconceived theories of
local antiquaries, there cannot be a doubt of the popular sacredness
attached to this sacramental stone in former times. An illustration of
the practice from which this originated is supposed to be traceable in
an ancient Norse custom, described in the Eyrbiggia Saga, by which,
when an oath was imposed, he by whom it was pledged passed his hand,
while pronouncing it, through a massive silver ring sacred to this
ceremony.[124]
The solemnity attached to a vow ratified by so awful a pledge as this
appeal to the Father of the Slain, the severe and terrible Odin,
continued to maintain its influence on the mind till a comparatively
recent date. Dr. Henry, writing in 1784, refers to the custom as having
fallen into disuse within twenty or thirty years of the time he wrote,
and adds, "this ceremony was held so very sacred in those times, that
the person who dared to break the engagement was counted infamous, and
excluded all society." Principal Gordon, of the Scots College, Paris,
who visited Orkney in 1781, thus refers to a curious example, showing
probably the latest traces of this venerable traditionary relic of
Scandinavian superstition:[125]
"At some distance from the semicircle stands a stone by itself,
eight feet high, three broad, nine inches thick, with a round
hole on the side next the lake. The original design of this
hole was unknown, till about twenty years ago it was discovered
by the following circumstance: A young man had seduced a girl
under promise of marriage, and she proving with child, was
deserted by him. The young man was called before the Session;
the elders were particularly severe. Being asked by the
minister the cause of so much rigour, they answered, You do not
know what a bad man this is; he has broke the promise of Odin.
Being further asked what they meant by the promise of Odin,
they put him in mind of the stone at Stenhouse, with the round
hole in it, and added, that it was customary when promises
were made, for the contracting parties to join hands through
this hole; and promises so made were called the promises of
Odin."[126]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account