The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the ColosseumParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the Colosseum
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
[153] See No. 1742, and Plate III.
[154] Probably the aqueduct which passes there had a hole made in it; the
same aqueduct goes on from this side of the building to the south-east
end. This occurred again in 1874, and a steam engine had again to be
employed. This passage, before it turns, goes in the direction of the
_castellum aquæ_ of the time of Alexander Severus, of which there are
considerable remains between this point and the Cœlian. The _specus_
of an aqueduct of the same period passes along between the Cœlian and
the amphitheatre, near the surface of the ground; a portion of this was
visible in 1874.
[155] See Photograph, No. 367.
[156] See p. 5.
[157] In the summer of 1875 they were again suspended for want of funds
to pay for the steam-engine, which costs a pound a-day.
[158] Of which an account has been given in pages 5, 6, 10, 13, 14, 21,
35, of this chapter.
[159] See Plate III.
[160] See Plate XV.
[161] About the year 1865 a new drain was made by the Municipality under
that road, and when it was nearly finished the old drain of the Empire
(?), or of the time of Sylla (?), was found under it at a considerably
lower level. It is fifteen metres below the surface of the ground, and
so much filled up with earth that it is considered (in 1876) quite
impracticable to have it cleared out and repaired.
[162] Photos., Nos. 3203, 3283.
[163] For the _pegmata_, see p. 14, and the authorities quoted in the
note.
[164] See Plates XVIII., XIX., and Photos., No. 3283, and the graffito of
the net, Plate XXIV.
[165] See Photos., No. 3201, and Plate XIX.
[166] See the evidence of this, p. 13.
[167] See Plates XIII. and XVI.
[168] Dionis Cass. Hist. Rom., lib. lxxii. c. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21.
[169] Some scholars say that those scenes could not have taken place on
this site, because the Flavian Amphitheatre was not built in the time of
Nero. But it has been shewn that an awning in the _amphitheatre of Nero_
is described by Pliny, writing at the time, during the life and reign
of Nero, as he uses the expression _principis Neronis_, which he could
hardly have used after his death. No other site but this can be found
for such a large building as an amphitheatre, and this is close to the
Golden House of Nero. In any case athletes or wrestlers, and _naumachia_
or naval fights, are part of the tradition of many Roman amphitheatres,
and there are sufficient remains of the substructures in many places
to prove that this tradition is well founded. The _corridors_ of the
Flavian Emperors, though splendid additions to this great theatre, were
not _necessary_ for the performance of those pantomimes. It has also been
shewn that the old tufa walls _must be_ earlier than the time of Nero,
and are probably of the time of Sylla.
[170] See Plates IV. to X.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account