The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the ColosseumParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the Colosseum
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
Colosseum; the soil there is on the level of the arena, and that is
seven metres above the original pavement; the water in the old quarry
is therefore fifteen metres, or about 45 ft. above the level of the old
drain of the Colosseum, and nearly six metres above the drain made by the
Municipality.
This opportunity may be taken to say, that great credit is due to the
Municipality of Rome for the energy and perseverance with which they have
carried on an admirable system of new drainage for the city; and not
only the new city on the hills on the site of the city of the Kings and
of the Empire, but also of the modern city of the Popes, built in the
swamp between the hills and the Tiber, the draining of which is by no
means easy. Nothing can be better than the old Cloaca Maxima, which is
still the chief drain to this part of Rome, or for that of part of the
old city; it drains the water of the streams that run down from three
hills, the Palatine, the Capitoline, and the Quirinal, on this side. But
on the northern side of the Capitoline Hill, in which was the Campus
Martius, the mediæval drains are by no means equally good with those of
the Kings; the mouths of these drains are always open to the Tiber, and
when there is a flood of the river the water runs up the drains, and the
Pantheon, which stands on very low ground, is always the first place in
Rome to be flooded. Surely a sluice-gate might be placed at the mouth of
each drain, suspended from a bar at the top, and worked on pivots only,
which would let the water out, but would not let any in, as in the common
_traps_ of a drain in daily use in England.
The Roman authorities say that the water of the Tiber would close the
doors, and not let any of the water in the drain pass out, but if the
door was placed obliquely, and let the water flow past it with as little
pressure upon it as possible, the water in the drains, which runs rapidly
and with considerable force, would very soon force open the door that was
suspended at the mouth of it. Any embankment of the Tiber would be money
thrown away; if the great engineers and architects who built the wall of
Aurelian, could not make it secure on the bank of the Tiber, no modern
engineers or architects will do so. We see that nearly the whole of the
great wall of Aurelian, on the bank of the Tiber, has been swept away by
the great floods; the substructures of the towers, under water, remain,
and are visible when the water is low in the river, but all along the
bank has been swept away. When the water rises at the rate of a foot in
an hour, and continues to do so for twenty hours consecutively, and runs
at the rate of nine or ten miles an hour, no wall can stand against it
that offers any resistance to it; smooth walls parallel to the course of
the river might stand, as the quay of the Ripa Grande does, because it
offers no resistance to the water.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account