The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueductsParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueducts
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
5. Ciminia, another name for the Sabbatina [X.], according to Onuphrius
Panvinius; but the sources of the Sabbatina are very distant from the
Monte Cimino. Ciminia is perhaps written for Curtia, another source of
the Claudia; but again, this does not account for another of the nineteen
streams.
6. Damnata. This may be the stream that comes from the Quirinal and the
Palatine, and which formed the lake of Curtius, whence it was conveyed
into the Cloaca Maxima, as it still is. It was therefore _condemned_ to
serve for washing out a drain only.
There is reason to believe that some of these nineteen streams are
the natural watercourses, and others merely branches from the great
aqueducts, as has been said.
There were 1,452 _lacus_, that is wells, or cisterns of water, supplied
by the aqueducts in Rome, according to the _Horum Breviarium_ of the
_Notitia_, or Catalogue of the fourth century, and they must in many
instances have been very near together. A reservoir for the distribution
of the water was almost a necessary termination of an aqueduct, and at a
junction it was equally necessary.
Rutilius describes the aqueducts about A.D. 417, in such terms as shew
that they were not destroyed in the first siege of the Goths[208].
Cassiodorus represents them as perfect, about twenty years before the
siege carried on by Vitiges[209]. At the time of the siege by that
king, Procopius (i. 19), writing in the sixth century, records only the
fourteen aqueducts already mentioned[210].
APPENDIX.—AQUEDUCTS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account