The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueductsParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueducts
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
Immediately outside of the Porta S. Pancrazio the _specus_ forms the
boundary of the beautiful garden of the Villa Pamphili-Doria, on the
northern side, for about a mile. It is faced with fine reticulated work
of the time of Trajan, excepting where it has been clumsily repaired with
brick in the time of Paul V., and it has a wall built upon it. Shortly
after passing the limits of the garden, it arrives at the old junction
or fork where the stream was divided into two branches, one going to
the fountains in front of S. Peter’s and the Vatican, the other to the
great fountain rebuilt by Paul V. above S. Pietro in Montorio, as before
mentioned. In this part the _specus_, being above ground, had been much
mutilated, and the engineers of Paul V. found it more convenient to
change its course and make a new _specus_ for a short distance, than to
repair the old one. The ancient reservoir and the fork in the _specus_
were abandoned, and new ones made about a hundred yards off, on rather
a higher level. The old reservoir or _castellum aquæ_ was turned into a
farm-house, by piercing the walls with windows and doors, and putting
on a new roof. The original arrangement for the separation of the great
stream into two smaller ones may still be seen in the farm-yard. The old
_specus_ is here just below the level of the ground, with its reservoir,
but there is an opening into it. A portion of it can also be seen under
the Villa Spada, just within the Porta di S. Pancrazio. From the point of
junction, or rather of division, to La Storta, and nearly all the way to
the lakes, the _specus_ is underground; but the line of the branch added
by Trajan can be traced by the respirators as far as the junction, ten
miles from Rome, where, in the year 1830, an inscription[170] was found
on the Via Claudia, near the tavern of La Storta, stating that Trajan had
carried this water into the city at his own expense in A.D. 109. In the
inscriptions put up by Paul V. after his repairs, A.D. 1611[171], the
Alsietina, Sabatina, and Trajana are all considered as the same.
XI. TRAJANA OR HADRIANA[172] (?), (A.D. 120).
“In the time of the Emperor Nerva the health of the eternal
city was sensibly improved by the increased number of
castella, public works and buildings, and cisterns. Nor was
his generosity less for the benefit of private individuals,
so that those who had previously timidly obtained water in an
unlawful manner were now allowed to do so by his favour. Lest
some of the waters should perish uselessly great cleanliness
was adopted, and there was better ventilation, and the causes
of the bad climate for which the city was formerly infamous
were removed. I must not pass by the necessity for a new
distribution of the waters; but this, with the increased
quantity we have added, can easily be arranged, that is, when
the work is completed[173].”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account