The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
“To-day weapons and ambuscades are things of the romantic past. Twelve
years have sufficed, under M. de Kallay’s administration, not only to
remove all traces of the wild, inhospitable, inaccessible Bosnia of
which I have been speaking, but indeed and especially to banish even the
memory of those dark days of strenuous battle, and to wipe away from the
hearts of both invader and invaded all traces of the hate which then
animated them. In the year 1882, the superior administration of the two
provinces (Bosnia and Herzegovina) passed into the hands of the Minister
of Finance of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, who was then, and who is
still, M. de Kallay. From this moment all is changed. The powers given
to the new administration are almost unlimited. The civil element has
been substituted for the military element, and pacification has
succeeded conquest. The greatest effort is made to reassure all minds.
Not a single minaret has disappeared, not a _muezzin_ is deprived of his
resources.”
A recent writer wisely says that “the Armenian question, if it ever be
settled at all, must be taken out of the Turk’s hands, whether he like
it or not.... And we have an opportunity now, which may never come our
way again, of settling a difficulty which, if allowed to develop much
longer, will prove more fruitful of mischief than any with which we have
been confronted for a generation or more.”[26]
[Illustration:
TURKISH SOLDIER, “REGULAR.”
]
C. B. Norman, special correspondent of _The London Times_, in his
_Armenia and the Campaign of 1877_[27] wrote words which are even truer
to-day. I condense:
“Naturally, since I have been here I have had many, very many,
opportunities of conversing with Turkish officers and men on the
so-called Eastern Question; and the consequence is that, arriving in the
country a strong philo-Turk, deeply impressed with the necessity of
preserving the ‘integrity of the Empire’ in order to uphold ‘British
interests,’ I now fain would cry with Mr. Freeman: ‘Perish, British
interests, perish our dominion in India, rather than that we should
strike a blow on behalf of the wrong against the right!’[28]
“There is no finer race in the world than the Turk proper. Brave,
honest, industrious, truthful, frugal, kind-hearted, and hospitable, all
who _know_ the Osmanli speak well of him. He is as much oppressed by the
curse of misgovernment as his Christian fellow-subject; and had the
members of the Eastern Question Association as keen a sense of justice
as they have love of writing, they would long ago have obliterated the
word ‘Christian’ from their lengthy documents, and striven to ameliorate
the condition of the lower orders of the subjects of the Porte,
downtrodden as they are by an effete section of the Mohammedan race, who
have degenerated in mind, body, and estate, since coming in contact with
Western civilization.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account