The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
“I do not for one moment mean to deny that there are honest, energetic
Turks, capable of exercising their talents for their country’s good; but
these men are powerless. The vital powers of the nation are so sapped by
centuries of misrule, the minds of the majority are so imbued with the
belief that all ideas not born of Moslem brains and sanctified by Moslem
usage are false, and to be scorned, that were any honest-minded
gentleman to rise to power, and endeavor to check the present system of
misgovernment, he would not remain in office one week. Captain Gambier’s
able article on the ‘Life of Midhat Pasha’[29] bears me out in this
idea.”
CHAPTER VI.
THE SULTAN AND THE SUBLIME PORTE.
Church and State are one and inseparable in Turkey. The Sultan of the
empire is also Calif of the Mohammedan religious world. He cannot
abdicate either office, if he would, without vacating the other by the
same act. In fact, herein lies the secret of the present Sultan’s
policy, which seems suicidal on general principles of government. He
has, on the one hand, been lavish in the building and repairing of
mosques, and in establishing Moslem schools throughout his dominions. On
the other hand, he has infringed and ignored the ancient rights and
privileges of the Christian Patriarchates which were guaranteed by
Mohammed II., and have hitherto been regarded as sacred. He has blocked
the erection of new Christian schools and churches, and even the
repairing of such as are falling into decay. There were formerly
thousands of non-Moslems in civil positions, faithfully serving the
government; under the new régime, however, they have been systematically
removed and excluded. And why has all this been done? Because the Sultan
is a good conscientious Mohammedan, it is only fair to believe. Even if
he were not a sincere believer, he would still feel compelled to adopt
the same course, as a matter of internal political necessity. The Moslem
population look to him as the Defender of the Faith, girded with the
sword of the Prophet. He feels it imperative at all hazards to regain
lost prestige over his fanatical subjects, especially in the south,
where rumblings of discontent and disloyalty are ominous.[30]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account