The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
And yet we are told that the Ottoman Turks are tolerant of the members
of other faiths. This is true in the same sense that the stomach is
spoken of as being “tolerant” of certain easily digestible articles of
food. Yes, so long as Christians submit to all forms of oppression, and
make no claims in regard to rights which are generally supposed to
belong to all men, they are gladly tolerated.
That the discrimination against Christian subjects is due to their
religious belief, is, further, clearly shown by the fact that
Mohammedans, who abandon the creed of the government, immediately
forfeit their special privileges, and even incur punishment as
criminals. Apostacy from Islam is treason to the Sultan. Converts to
Christianity are arrested and imprisoned. In the rare instances when
foreign governments venture to inquire into such cases, the Ottoman
authorities blandly insist that they care nothing for the man’s
religion, but that he must be arrested for “avoiding conscription,” or
on some other fictitious charge. He is, thereupon, hurried off to some
distant military post, or finds a living grave in an unknown dungeon.
Such is the politico-religious organization called the Ottoman
Government. Can this union of Church and State be dissolved? It can not
be. The bond which unites them, according to Mohammedan doctors, is
vital, as in the case of the Siamese twins.
Inasmuch as the bond cannot be cut, the only remaining hope must be in
improving the health of the two bodies thus indissolubly united.
Unfortunately, no change can be hoped for in the case of either part of
this dual patient. _Mohammedanism at its birth was a malformation_, to
say the least, and will continue so even though restored to a state of
perfect health. In the opinion of every orthodox Mohammedan, the Koran
is a “perfect revelation of the will of God, sufficient and final,” and
“Islam is a separate distinct, and absolutely exclusive religion.”
As attempts are frequently made to convey a contrary impression on this
point, I quote the words of President George Washburn, of Robert
College, Constantinople, an impartial student of Islam, who for
thirty-five years has observed its practical workings in the Ottoman
Empire. At the World’s Parliament of Religions, in Chicago, 1893, he
read a paper on “The Points of Contact and Contrast between Christianity
and Mohammedanism.” His whole treatment is remarkable for its judicial
fairness, and his paper is commended to the reader who may desire a
brief, comprehensive, and fair estimate of Islam.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account