The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
“When we point out the evils of the rule of the Turk, some people tell
us that Christian rulers in past times have done things quite as bad as
the Turks. This is partly true, but not wholly. No Christian government
has ever gone on for so long a time ruling as badly as the Turk has
ruled. But it is true that Christian governments have in past times done
particular acts, which were as bad as the acts of the Turks. But this
argument, too, cuts the other way; for Christian governments have left
off doing such acts, while the Turks go on doing them still. The worst
Christian government is better now than it was one hundred years ago, or
five hundred years ago. The rule of the Turk is worse now than it was
one hundred years ago, or five hundred years ago. That is to say, the
worst Christian government can reform, while the Turk cannot.
“It is sometimes said that we ought not to set free the Christians for
fear that they should do some harm to the Mohammedans who would be left
in their land. Now, if the question were really put, Shall a minority of
oppressors go on oppressing the people of the land, or shall the
majority of the people of the land turn round and oppress the minority
who have hitherto oppressed them?—this last would surely be the lesser
evil of the two. But there is no ground for any such fear. No one wishes
to hurt any Mohammedan who will live peaceably and not hurt Christians.
No one wishes that any man, merely because he is a Mohammedan, should be
in any way worse off than a Christian, or be put under any disability as
compared with a Christian. There is no reason why he should be. For the
Mohammedan religion, though it does not command that Christians shall be
persecuted, does command that Christians shall be treated as subjects of
Mohammedans. But the Christian religion in no way commands that
Mohammedan shall be treated as the subject of Christian. Christians and
Mohammedans cannot live together on equal terms under a Mohammedan
government, because the Mohammedan religion forbids that they should;
but Mohammedans and Christians may perfectly well live together under a
Christian government. They do so under the governments both of England
and of Russia. The few Mohammedans who are left in Greece and in Servia
are in no way molested; there are mosques both at Chalkis and at
Belgrade. But it is foolish to argue, as some people do, that because
men of different religions can live together under a Christian
government, therefore they can live together under a Mohammedan
government; for both reason and the nature of the Mohammedan religion
prove that it is not so....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account