The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
“And do not let me be told that one nation has no authority over
another. Every nation, and if need be every human being, has authority
on behalf of humanity and of justice. (Hear, hear.) These are principles
common to mankind, and the violation of which may justly, at the proper
time, open the mouths of the very humblest among us. But in such cases
as these we must endeavor to do injustice to no one, and the more
dreadful the allegations may be, the more strictly it is our duty not to
be premature in assuming their truth, but to wait for an examination of
the case, and to see that what we say, we say upon a basis of
ascertained facts.
“Well, gentlemen, it was, my fate—my fortune, I think—about eighteen
years ago to take an active part with regard to other outrages which
first came up in the shape of rumor, but were afterwards too horribly
verified, in Bulgaria; but I never stirred in regard to those outrages
until in the first place, their existence and their character had been
established by indisputable authority; and, secondly, until I had found
myself driven to absolute despair in regard to any hopes that I could
entertain of a proper representation of British feeling on the part of
the government which was then in office. You will see, therefore, that
my conduct on this occasion has not been inconsistent with what I then
did (hear, hear), and it does not imply, old as I am, that my feelings
have been deadened in regard to matters of such a dreadful description.
(Cheers.)
“Now I remained silent because I had full confidence that the government
of the Queen would do its duty, and I still entertain that confidence.
Its power and influence are considerable; at the same time they are
limited. It is not in the power of this country, acting singly, to
undertake to represent humanity at large, and to inflict, even upon the
grossest wrongdoers, the punishments that their crimes may have
deserved; but there is such a thing as the conscience of mankind at
large, and the conscience is not limited even to Christendom. (Hear,
hear.) And there is a great power in the collected voice of outraged
humanity. What happened in Bulgaria? The Sultan and his government
absolutely denied that anything wrong had been done. Yes, but their
denial was shattered by the force of facts. The truth was exhibited to
the world. It was thought an extravagance at the time when I said: ‘It
is time that the Turk and all his belongings should go out of Bulgaria
bag and baggage.’ They did go out of Bulgaria, and they went out of a
good deal besides. But, quite independent of any sentiment of right,
justice, or humanity, common sense and common prudence ought to have
taught them not to repeat the infernal acts which disgraced the year
1876, so far as Turkey was concerned. (Cheers.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account